Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

The Case of Chen Gang and the Legal Sanction against Corrupted Officials in Early Ming

Continuation of Systemic Failures: from Cui Ning to Contemporary Wrongful Conviction Cases in China

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Political Connections with Corrupt Government Bureaucrats and Corporate M&A Decisions: A Natural Experiment from the Anti-Corruption Cases in China

From Special Mitigation to Unconstitutional Censorship: Taking Xu Ting Case as an Example

Some New Proofs about Mr. Liu Changqing’s Life Story

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

The Motivation for Justice and Public Welfare:The Influence of Confucianism Upon Local Government Officials' Exercise of Public Function in Ch'ing Dynasty Based on Wei Neng Xin Lu

New Insights into Emperor Wen of Han’s 167 BCE Legal Reform: the Changes in the Grading System for Illicit Profit from Robberies

Official System,Language,and Judicature:Powers Moving from Manchu to Han Officials on the Board of Punishments in the Qing Dynasty

Reinterrogating Prisoners and Natural Calamities: Influence of the Manner of Relieving Natural Disasters on the Judicial System in Ancient China

New Study on Criminal Law of Qing Dynasty Approved by Emperor

Corruption in the Qing(淸) Dynasty as a Relationship between Heshen(和珅) and Emperor Qianlong(乾隆)

The Censorate and the Imperial Control of the Legal Knowledge in Ming Dynasty

Judicial Determination of a New Type of Bribery:In the Light of Designating “People v.Pan Yumei and Chen Ning”as a Guiding Case

Recent Anti-corruption Legal Reforms in China

A Trial Explanation on the Bamboo Slips of Chu,the Admonitions of Bao Shuya and Xi Peng

THE LOCAL COMMUNITY IN EARLY MING SOCIAL LEGISLATION: MING TAIZU'S APPROACH TO TRANSFORMATION AND CONTROL IN THE “GREAT WARNING”

The Amendment of Central Regulations and the Governance of the Qing Dynasty: An Analysis Based on <i>The Great Qing Code and The Collected Statutes and Precedents</i>

Elite Power Competition and Corruption Investigation in China: A Case Study

The Disputes over the Rotating Duty System of Sacrificial Lands in the Late Qing and Republican Periods——Using the Longquan Judicial Archives to Look at the Evolution of the Family Inheritance System