Compromise outside Action in the Second Instance and Effect of the First Instance Judgment

Wang Yaxin

2012-01-01

Abstract:Guiding Case No.2 promulgated by the Supreme People's Court touches upon the effective conflict or concurrence between the compromise contract outside the action in the second instance and the judgment of the first instance.The procedural rules contained in it say,when both parties come to compromise outside the action in the second instance,and the people's court permits the withdrawal of the appeal,if one party defaults and the other party applies for the enforcement of the first instance judgment,the people's court should permit,which may be interpreted by the theory of alternative execution.The introduction of the principle of good faith and the expression of its role in the legal interpretation are also remarkable in Guiding Case No.2. Guiding Cases should appear in series as time goes on,so that they can reconcile the relationship between flexibleness and consecutiveness of rules both of which are demanded by the legal practice.In this sense,Guiding Case No.2 could play the role as a starting point or an intermediate item in the development of the procedural rules.In this article,from the fictional scenario 1 to scenario 8 factually similar to the basic facts of Guiding Case No.2,rules contained in it change subtly but with consistent characteristics,in the respects of both their contents and applications.Rules contained in Guiding Case No.2 may develop through the approach in which the principle of good faith develops into a substantive and elementary one,or evolve in accordance with the answer from the legal practice to the choice between withdrawal of the appeal and withdrawal of the originating claim.The analysis of Guiding Case No.2 indicates that the key concepts in regard to the guiding case system as "similarity" and "reference" may be specified and typed gradually.