Study on Pragmatic Cooperative Principles of Jury Instructions in Hong Kong

章文君,程乐
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5035.2012.02.020
2012-01-01
Abstract:Violation of Cooperative Principles in pragmatics in jury instructions could bring about various cor- responding legal consequences in legal procedures. By carrying out a case-based study in Hong Kong, it reveals that not every ambiguity, contradiction or deficiency in jury instruction will necessarily lead to the violation of legal procedures, but the violation of Cooperative Principles in pragmatics is obviously one of the crucial rationales for the litigant' s appeal and the appellate court ' s suspension or quashing of the original decision rendered by the lower court. The paper, therefore, suggests that Cooperative Principles should be the guidance to analyze whether the le- gal procedures are violated or not in jury instructions, which may also have the referential significance for the per- fection of judge' s aufldanmgsrecht just integrated in the legal proceeding in Mainland China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?