Interventions In Hong Kong Courts: A Case-Based Study

Le Cheng
2012-01-01
Abstract:Interventions in courtroom have been the research interest for many scholars. This case-based study examines the interventions by judges or counsels in the courts of Hong Kong with the aim to contribute the study on interventions in courtroom. There are two worth-noting findings in this study: as powerful participants in court interactions, the judges and the counsels are used to and more than happy to use interventions; as a neutral adjudicator, the judges should refrain themselves from unfair interventions by themselves but also from counsels. The propriety of judges' behavior in their interventions is, in return judged by other judges of a higher court. The conflict between solidarity as a discursive code and neutrality as a professional ethic complicate the interventions in courtroom, which is a complex of different social actors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?