Abstract:In common law jurisdictions, the notion of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is frequently related to notions such as the belief or certainty of a judge or a juror about reality. The notion of balance of probabilities is however related to likelihood or probability. In the present study, we link belief and proof by introducing the notion of epistemic modality, which is concerned with the speaker's belief in propositional probability. The variation in the orientation of epistemic modality helps to integrate the two levels of proof and bridge the apparent test gap between them. The notion of relevance is further introduced in order to clarify the nature of legal proof by taking rape cases as example. This study also provides an integrated model to improve but diversify the expressions in terms of the burden of proof. For most courts, court judgments are processed only according to the general case data, procedural context; such kinds of fact-based information processing and information retrieval seldom help the court to make its decision unless with tremendous and repetitious work. For the consistency and efficiency of court adjudication, it is suggested in the present study that a Knowledge Management (KM) model mainly based on elements and factors which decide or affect the criminal liability. Such a KM model provides an overall framework, though non-exhaustive, and therefore makes court adjudication within narrow discretion and achieves the maximum justice.

A Case-Based Study Of Jury Instructions In Hong Kong

Jury Instructions in Hong Kong: A Gricean Perspective

Study on Pragmatic Cooperative Principles of Jury Instructions in Hong Kong

Public Opinions on Criminal Trials in China: A Comparative Study of Chinese College Students in the PRC and Hong Kong

Female and Jury

Interventions In Hong Kong Courts: A Case-Based Study

Revisiting Judgment Translation in Hong Kong

Attribution and Judicial Control in Chinese Court Judgments: a Corpus-Based Study

Epistemic modality in court judgments: A corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

A Corpus-Based Interpretation of the Discourse–cognitive–society Triangle on Chinese Court Judgments

A Sociosemiotic Interpretation of Linguistic Modality in Legal Settings

Defamation Case Law in Hong Kong: A Corpus-Based Study

A Court Judgment As Dialogue

A Pragmatic Turn In The Interpretation Of Court Judgments

Presuppositions And Discursive Control In Court Examinations

There-existential Sentences in Trial: A Corpus-based Approach

A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Civil Judgment of “The Besieged City” Copyright Infringement Case

Hope and Choice: the Resolution of the Jury's Function and Realization

Hard Cases,Judicial Decisions and the Weight among Substantive-Factors

A Discussion on Criminal Judges' Interpretation of Criminal Law