Abstract:Charge trap memory devices with Zr x Si1–x O2 films as charge trapping layer consisting of nine [(ZrO2) m (SiO2) n (ZrO2) m (SiO2) n ] units have been fabricated and investigated. The composition distribution was modulated by controlling the m and n values in each unit. It is observed that the variation of composition distribution can induce the energy band bending and additional potential barrier, which significantly improve the program/erase speed and data retention characteristics as well as extending the temperature insensitive range. When the effective potential barrier including classic potential barrier and additional potential barrier is 1.52 eV, the memory device exhibits a lower charge loss of 4.5% at 200 °C over a period of 104 s, a wider temperature insensitive range of 20 °C–111 °C, and a faster program time of 4.0 × 10−5 s achieving +6 V flat band voltage shift. The effective potential barrier values should be in the range of 1.52–1.36 eV, taking into consideration the trade-off between the retention and program/erase speed. The additional potential barrier can increase the electron tunneling distance in the directions of tunneling layer and blocking layer, giving rise to recapture process and temperature insensitive of retention characteristics. In addition, the additional potential barrier decreases the electron tunneling distance arriving trapping layer conduction band, improving the program speed. The results provide a reference to trapping layer composition distribution for future charge trap memory applications.

Electrical Characteristics Of Charge Trap Flash Memory With A Composition Modulated (Zro2)(X)(Al2o3)(1-X) Film

Performance Improvement of Charge Trap Flash Memory by Using A Composition-Modulated High-K Trapping Layer

Charge Storage Characteristics of Atomic Layer Deposited Zro2/Al2o3 Multilayered Films

Effects of Composition on the Memory Characteristics of (Hfo2)x(al2o3)1-Xbased Charge Trap Nonvolatile Memory

Correlation between memory characteristics and energy band bending resulted from composition distribution of trapping layer for charge trap memory

Impact of the Interfaces in the Charge Trap Layer on the Storage Characteristics of ZrO2/Al2O3 Nanolaminate-Based Charge Trap Flash Memory Cells

The Charge Storage Characteristics of Zro2 Nanocrystallite-Based Charge Trap Nonvolatile Memory

Enhanced Memory Performance by Tailoring the Microstructural Evolution of (zro 2 ) 0.6 (sio 2 ) 0.4 Charge Trapping Layer in the Nanocrystallites-Based Charge Trap Flash Memory Cells

Effect of Energy-Band Bending Induced by Precipitation of ZrO2nanocrystals on Memory Characteristics of Charge-Trap Flash Memory

Study on the Charge Storage Characteristics of High-k(HfO_2)_(0.8)(Al_2O_3)_(0.2) Based Charge Trapping Memory Device

The Dominant Factors Affecting the Memory Characteristics of (ta2o5)x(al2o3)1−x High-K Charge-Trapping Devices

Enhanced charge storage characteristics by ZrO2 nanocrystallites precipitated from amorphous (ZrO2)0.8(SiO 2)0.2 charge trapping layer

A Charge-Trap Memory Device with a Composition-Modulated Zr-Silicate High- K Dielectric Multilayer Structure

Improvement of the Charge Retention of a Non-Volatile Memory by a Bandgap-Engineered Charge Trap Layer

Process Optimization of HfAlO Trapping Layer for High Performance Charge Trap Flash Memory Application

Characteristics of atomic layer deposition-derived all-high-k-based structures for flash memory application

Enhancement of the Charge Trapping Performances with HfAlO Composite Oxide Thin Films in SONOS-type Nonvolatile Memory

Ta2o5-Tio2 Composite Charge-Trapping Dielectric for the Application of the Nonvolatile Memory

Electronic Structure and Charge-Trapping Characteristics of the Al2O3-TiAlO-SiO2 Gate Stack for Nonvolatile Memory Applications

Band-Alignment Dominated Retention Behaviors In High-K Composite Charge-Trapping Memory Devices

A TiAl2O5 Nanocrystal Charge Trap Memory Device