Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: a Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

Zun-li XU,Lin-hui WANG,Wei CHEN,Qing YANG,Bing LIU,Zhen-jie WU,Hai-bo SHENG,Ying-hao SUN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1008.2011.00938

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare clinical outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma(RCC) and to identify the indicators for each approach.Methods A total of 258 patients underwent transperitoneal(n=116) or retroperitoneal(n=142) laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for RCC.The operation time,blood loss during operation, fasting period after surgery and hospital stay were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time was 80-315 min(a mean of [167±66.8] min) for transperitoneal approach and 85-280 min(a mean of [152±48.8] min) for retroperitoneal approach(P=0.034).The blood loss was 50-1,000 ml(a mean of [181±140.4] ml) for transperitoneal approach and 50-800 ml(a mean of [171±132.9] ml) for retroperitoneal approach(P=0.544).The fasting period of surgery was 1-5 d(a mean of [2.8±1.3] d) for transperitoneal approach and 1-5 d(a mean of [2.9±1.2] d) for retroperitoneal approach(P=0.801).The hospital stay was 3-9 d(a mean of [6.6±1.5] d) for transperitoneal approach and 3-8 d(a mean of [6.5±1.6] d) for retroperitoneal approach(P=0.477).Conclusion Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches both can yield satisfactory surgical outcomes in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.The transperitoneal approach is suitable for tumors with a larger size.