Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy(Report of 247 Cases)

Guowei XIA,Qiang DING,Chuanyu SUN,Ke XU,Yuanfang ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1420.2009.05.005
2009-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical value of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.Methods: 247 patients were confirmed with renal carcinoma by B ultrasonic examination,IVU plus KUB and(or) retrograde urography.148 cases were right renal cell carcinoma,99 cases were left renal cell carcinoma.TNM stage:T _1N_0M_0 188 cases,T_2N_0M_0 59 cases.All cases were underwent transabdominal or retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.The operation time,blood loss,postoperative drainage volume,intestinal function recovery time and postoperative length of stay were observed.Results:The operating time was from 80 to 150 minutes( mean 120 minutes),the blood loss was from 100 to 300 ml(mean 200 ml),the postoperative drainage volume was from 100 to 300 ml(mean 200 ml).Removed drainage tube in 3-5 days.Postoperative intestinal function recovery time was 2-3 days with transabdominal approach,was 1-2 days with retroperitoneal approach.The postoperative hospital stay was from 7 to 9 days(mean 8 days).There was no significant difference in transabdominal and retroperitoneal approach.All cases were clear cell carcinoma by pathological reports.The postoperative follow-up time was from 3 to 36 months(mean 15 months).There is no recurrence and metastasis in tumor.Conclusions:The transabdominal or retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has the merits of mini-invasion,less bleeding and rapid recovery.It is significantly better than open surgery.Transabdominal approach is with good vision,and retroperitoneal approach is with non intrusive.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?