Retroperitoneoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy in cases with larger tumors (Average Diameter 7 cm):5-year experience

ZHOU Liqun,ZHANG Kai,LI Ningchen,HE Zhisong,WU Shiliang,ZHANG Xiaochun,HAO Jinrui,JIN Jie,PAN Bainian,NA Yanqun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1420.2007.11.011

2007-01-01

Journal of Clinical Urology

Abstract:Objective:The retroperitoneoscopic approach for renal cell carcinoma is quickly evolving.We report our experience with retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy and compare it to a contemporary cohort of patients who underwent open radical nephrectomy with tumor mass larger than 4 cm.Methods:From January of 2002 to July of 2006,36 patients with such tumor masses underwent retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomies for renal cell carcinoma.Clinical data is reviewed and compared to a contemporary group of 46 patients who underwent open radical nephrectomy.Results:For patients with tumor mass 4-10 cm,the retroperitoneoscopic group had significantly reduced estimated blood loss(210±30 versus 410±100 ml,P<0.01),quicker recovery of intestinal function(3.9±1 versus 7.4±2 days,P<0.01)and shorter postoperative hospital stay(7±1.3 versus 8.5±1.8 days,P<0.01).The operating time in the retroperitoneoscopic group is similar with the open group(172±35 versus 165±40 mins,P>0.01).The average followup was 27 months(range 9 to 50)for all patients.By the time of the last followup,there have been no cases of tumor seeding in both trocar and open incision.Conclusions:Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy,although technically demanding,is a valuable alternative for managing localized renal tumors 4 to 10 cm in size.It affords patients an improved postoperative course,a quicker recovery and a similar efficacy to compare with open procedure within 3-year follow-up.