Laparoscopic upper urinary tract anatomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

GAO Xin,FANG You-qiang,ZHOU Xiang-fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2009.02.026
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the relationship between laparoscopic characteristics of upper urinary tract anatomy and clinical effects of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in order to explore surgical skills of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.Methods:Sixty-three cases with localized renal carcinoma were enrolled in this study.Among them,tumor of 35 cases were in the left kidney and 28 cases were in the right kidney.The maximum diameter of tumor were 1.5cm to 8.2cm with an average diameter 3.6cm.All patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy according to characteristics of upper urinary tract anatomy.Routinely,retroperitoneal space was created and laparoscopic dissociation of dorsomedial kidney was performed in bloodless plane.After ureter was dissected,renal pedicle was dissocaited and Hem-O-lock ligation of renal vessels was done before clipping the vessels.Then,fully free kidney was found when dissociation around the renal anterior diastema was finished.Results:All the operations were successful with no case transferred to open operation.No case had blood transfusion and severe complications during surgery.The mean operative time was 48min(range from 35 to 90min).The mean intraoperative blood loss was 40ml(range from 20 to 150ml).All patients discharged from hospital 3 to 7 days after surgery.Follow-up was carried out for 5 to 34 months in 62 patients.Only one case suffered from retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis.Others had no local recurrence or distant metastasis by ultrasound and chest X-ray inspection.Conclusions:Dissociation of perirenal space in bloodless plane and related surgical skills of handling renal pedicle according to laparoscopic characteristics of upper urinary tract anatomy can reduce intraoperative blood loss and complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?