Abstract:Objective:To investigate the clinical effect and demonstrate the techniques of single position laparoscopic nephroureterectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 84 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients admitted to the Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from September 2018 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 39 males and 45 females, with a median age of (64.9±9.3)years and mean BMI of(24.7±3.4)kg/m 2. The tumor was located on the left side in 47 cases and the right side in 37 cases. All 84 patients received single position laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into two groups, including 67 cases undergoing nephrectomy first, and then bladder cuff excision was performed along ureter(traditional group), 17 cases undergoing bladder cuff excision before clamping the ureter below the tumor, and then nephrectomy was performed along the ureter to the head side (modified group). There was no statistically significant in the comparison of age [(65.5±9.4)years vs.(62.7±8.9)years], BMI[(24.9±3.5)kg/m 2vs.(23.9±3.3)kg/m 2], left/right side tumor of(38/29 cases vs. 9/8 cases), tumor location (in renal pelvis or calyx or upper/middle/lower ureter being 46/9/12 cases vs. 13/2/2 cases)and tumor stage(T 1-2/T 3-4: 54/13 cases vs. 15/2 cases) between traditional group and modified group ( P>0.05). The operation time, estimate blood loss, postoperative intestinal function recovery time and postoperative drainage time were recorded and compared. Results:All 84 cases were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean operation time was (160.4±50.1)min, the mean estimated blood loss was(59.4±24.4)ml, the median postoperative intestinal function recovery time was 1(1, 2)d and the mean postoperative drainage time was (4.8±1.9)d(No drainage tube was placed in 4 patients). No Clavien Dindo >grade 3 complications occured. There was no significant difference in the comparison of operation time [(159.2±52.9)min vs. (164.7±38.1)min], estimate blood loss [(60.5±26.2)ml vs. (55.0±17.5)ml], postoperative intestinal function recovery time [1(1-2)d vs. 2(1-2)d] and drainage removal time [(4.8±1.8)d vs. (5.2±2.0)d] between traditional group and modified group ( P>0.05). The postoperative pathology of 84 cases was urothelial carcinoma, and the pathological results of the resection margin were negative. The median follow-up of 84 upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients was 13(3, 28)months. Five patients were lost to follow-up. In traditional group, 5 patients had bladder tumor recurrence, and 5 patients had distant metastasis. In modified group, no bladder tumor recurrence occurred and 1 patient had distant metastasis. Conclusions:Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in single position is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Treatment of the bladder cuff excision firstly is more in line with the principle of tumor-free and increase surgical space.

RetroperitoneaL Laparoscopic radicaL nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothe‐LiaL carcinoma

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumor:report of 15 cases

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy(report of 36 cases)

Clinical analysis of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroure-terectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Radical Nephroureterctomy of Retroperitioneal Laparoscopic for Upper Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Clinical outcomes of retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder-cuff resection of upper urinary tract carcinoma

Comparison of different radical resection of renal pelvis carcinoma

Laparoscopic upper urinary tract anatomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

Clinical Efficacy Evaluation of Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy

Analysis of the efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedure for radical nephrectomy

Radical nephroureterectomy and partial cystectomy for upper urinary tract and bladder tumor by laparoscopic combined open surgery(8 cases report)

Transurethral ureteral orifice resection versus open resection after retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary urothelial carcinoma: a clinical control study of 59 cases

Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Local Renal Pelvic Carcinoma with Poorly Differentiated Tumor:Comparison with Open Nephroureterectomy

Clinical Study of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Effects and Surgical Techniques of Single Position Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy

Comparison of Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal and Open Surgery for Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy and Open Nephrectomy for Radical Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

Clinical Research on Retroperitoneal Laparoscopy Combined with Miner Abdominal Incision for Treatment of Carcinoma of Renal Pelvis

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy(Report of 247 Cases)

Technique of retroperitoneoscopic anatomical radical nephrectomy

Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer--a report of 43 cases]