Clinical Efficacy Evaluation of Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy

PAN Shou-hua,WANG Shuo,XU Gang,WU Gang-feng,YAN Jia-jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1420.2010.09.003
2008-01-01
Abstract:【Objective】To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.【Methods】 Between August 2003 and April 2007, 55 patients with renal cell carcinoma underwent retroperitoneal (29 patients, group A) and transperitoneal (26 patients, group B) laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. The size of renal neoplasms was 2.0~8.5 (5.3±2.3) cm in group A and 1.8~8.7 (5.2±2.5) cm in group B respectively. The preoperative clinical stage was T1-2N0M0 in two groups. Tumor size, operating time, blood loss, time to control renal artery and vein, specimen weight, time to ambulation and the postoperative hospital stay were compared between group A and group B respectively. 【Results】The operations of group A were all successful, In group B, 1 case was failed and conversed to open surgery. Tumor size [(5.3±2.3) cm versus (5.2±2.5) cm], blood loss [(132±65) mL versus (136±59) mL], specimen weight [(598±345) g versus (585±337) g], time to ambulation [(28±10) h versus (29±11) h], the postoperative hospital stay [(5.5±1.6) d versus (5.4±1.7) d] were not significantly different (P 0.05) between two groups. While in group A, operating time [(159±55) min versus (215±70)min] and time to control renal artery and vein [(35±22) min versus (90±41) min] were significantly reduced than those of group B (P 0.01). 【Conclusions】 Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy can be performed efficiently and effectively with the retroperitoneal and transperi-toneal approach. While renal hilar control and total operative time may be quicker with retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?