Comparative study between robotic-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and retroper-itoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in treatment of early renal carcinoma

Jingping GE,Hao TANG,Wu WEI,Song XUE,Wenquan ZHOU,Jianping GAO,Bin YANG,Zhengyu ZHANG
2014-01-01
Chinese Clinical Oncology
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety between the robotic-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic partial ne-phrectomy( RALPN) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy( RLPN) in treating early renal carcinoma. Methods Retro-spective review of 70 renal carcinoma patients from May 2010 to October 2013 was conducted. Thirty-six patients were performed with RALPN( RALPN group) , and 34 patients underwent RLPN( RLPN group) . The operation time, renal artery clamping time, intraoper-ative blood transfusion, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and post-operative complications between the two groups were observed and compared. Results Both the two groups were performed successfully, and 2 cases intraoperatively convered to open surgery in RLPN group. The operation time, renal artery clamping time, blood loss and postoperative hospital stay of RALPN and RLPN group were(90. 5±12. 6)min and(110. 7±20. 3)min,(15. 2±5. 8)min and(24. 6±7. 2)min,(50. 2±9. 5)ml and(130. 2±22. 4)ml, (6. 1± 1. 7)d and (7. 8±2. 2)d. There were significant differences between the two groups (P<0. 05). The intraoperative blood transfusion between RALPN group and RLPN group were 0 and 11. 8%. In RALPN group, perirenal hematoma post-operation was found in one case, and in RLPN group, one case of urine leakage and 2 cases of secondary hemorrhage were found post-operation. All patients were of turmor-free survival. Conclusion RALPN is a quite effective, safe and minimally invasive surgical management for renal carcinoma with less post-operative complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?