Clinical Comparison of Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Approach of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

王硕,杜鹏,杨勇,张宁,赵强,安超,刘佳,汤星星
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4416.2017.03.022
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To evaluate and compare the efficiency of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.Methods A retrospective analysis of 63 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy,including 33 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery and 30 patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in our hospital from September 2013 to September 2014 were performed.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,warm ischemia time,blood Scr concentration,complications,removal time of drainage tube,hospital stays,wound healing time were collected and compared between the two groups.Results Transperitoneal group vs.retroperitoneal group,hemorrhage volume [(31.82 ± 14.71)vs.(27 ± 12.52) mL,P > 0.05],warm ischemia time [(26.09 ± 6.83) vs.(31.40 ± 2.32) min,P > 0.05],rates of complications [(8.57%) vs.(16.67%),P > 0.05],blood Scr concentration [(14.55 ± 4.14) vs.(9.06 ±2.86) μmoL/L,P >0.05],recovery eating time [(3.0 ±0.45) vs.(2.4 ±0.52)d,P>0.05],and hospital stays [(5.27 ± 1.42) vs.(4.9 ± 1.73) d,P > 0.05] have no statistics differences.But operation time [(89.91 ± 21.46) vs.(114.4 ± 31.54) min,P < 0.05] in transperitoneal group was significantly reduced while removal time of drainage tube was a little longer[(7.33 ± 2.06)vs.(12.18 ±2.71)d,P <0.05] compared with retroperitoneal group.Conclusions Compared with retroperitoneal approach,transperitoneal approach could achieve the same efficacy,and have the advantage of reduction of operation time,it is an efficiency and safety surgical method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?