Abstract:By discussing the relations of knowledge and morality, the author of this paper explores attempts to disclose possible errors made by modern Chinese scholars in exploring possible approaches to integrating traditional Confucianism with knowledge. According to the author, knowledge and morality are basically different in nature although there is no absolute distinction between them. Man shows his concerns about morality either by cognition or by practice. Each approach has its particular logic, and may develop along the lines of this logic by itself. While the integration of knowledge and morals may be a theoretical issue, their interaction and combination in the real sense only occurs in practice. The accusation that Confucianism “prioritizes morality over knowledge” is just as wrong as the accusation that scientists' pursuit of knowledge as “prioritizes knowledge over morality.” The integration of Confucianism with knowledge is mainly primarily a matter of practice rather than theory. Many modern researchers (particularly Neo-Confucians) seek an approach that integrates traditional Confucianism and the knowledge in Western intellectual traditions from the metaphysical and ontological perspectives. This is due to the fact that they fail to see the relationship between knowledge and morality, and wrongly accuse traditional Confucianism of prioritizing morality over knowledge. As a result, they fail to see the modern integration of Confucian moral traditions with knowledge as a process of self-cultivation and the individual's personal moral practice in maintaining or restructuring the values of the self in the face of the world of knowledge.

Mu Zongsan's Misinterpretations of Kant's Self and Mind

Beyond Substantiality and Illusion: the Problem of the Self in Buddhist Constructivism

The innate moral mind self-negation:Mou zongsan's thinking context and theoretical development

Questioning Mou Zongsan's Explanation of Kant's Thing-in-itself Concept

Some Doubts about Mu Zongsan's Ethic Existentialism

The Contribute And Predicament of Kant's Pure Self-consciousness Theory

On When Mou Zansan's Thought of Self-Negation Origins

Theoretical Significance of Mou Zongsan's "Self-Intuition"

Three Basic Elements in the Concept of "Self-negation"

New Interpretations of the Concept of the Self-negation under the Rule of Thirds

Who Was More Similar to Kant,Mencius or Zhu Xi——A Critical Inquiry of Mou Zongsan's Study of Kant

Intellectual Intuition and Moral Phenomenon:Mou Zongsan's Moral Ontology and Its Contributions to Western Philosophy

Mind and epistemic constructivism: Wang Yangming and Kant

A Comparative Study of Kant, Mou Zongsan and Fu Weixun

Kantian “ Intellectual Intuition ” and Intellectual Intuition as Understood by Mou Zongsan

Why Does Mou Zongsan Believe that Kant’s Thing Itself is not A Concept of Fact

Jin Shengtan's Mind-Nature Theory and Thought Dilemma in Late Ming Dynasty ——focusing on Doctrine of Zhong and Shu

On the Mou Zongsan's Exploration of Practical Wisdom Doctrine

Knowledge, Morals and the Modernization of Traditional Confucianism

Some Points about the Concept of "nature" in Kant's Philosophy and Aesthetics:Concurrently As Complement and Discussion with Mr. Liu Wei-qin's Views

Querying Mou Zongsan’s Doctrine of Xing Zhu