Abstract:Fu Weixun's philosophy started with the questioning of Kant and their connection was Mou Zongsan. Fu Weixun held that the core of Kantianism was key to two doors but he was unsatisfied with the Kantian way of solving such problems. Mou Zongsan thought that Kantianism could not solve the problem of why man had the free will of morals because it lacked a thorough understanding of human heart. On the one hand Fu Weixun approved Mou Zongsan's understanding of Kant in this aspect, but on the other he thought key to two doors was too narrow. Thus, Fu Weixun favored key to multi-doors which accepted the pluralism of the worldly truth. This new idea could redress Mou Zongsan's partiality of moral idealism and dogmatism but its logical conclusion might finally break down some basic concepts of Kantianism. Therefore, the final solution to the problems of Kantianism should not follow the positivist approach of key to two doors but focus on life itself, which was Fu Weixun's approach to understanding life.

Questioning Mou Zongsan's Explanation of Kant's Thing-in-itself Concept

Why Does Mou Zongsan Believe that Kant’s Thing Itself is not A Concept of Fact

Kantian “ Intellectual Intuition ” and Intellectual Intuition as Understood by Mou Zongsan

Intellectual Intuition and Moral Phenomenon:Mou Zongsan's Moral Ontology and Its Contributions to Western Philosophy

Theoretical Significance of Mou Zongsan's "Self-Intuition"

Querying Mou Zongsan’s Doctrine of Xing Zhu

A Comparative Study of Kant, Mou Zongsan and Fu Weixun

The Ontological Implication of Mou Zongsan's "vertical Interpretation of Vertical Relationships"

The innate moral mind self-negation:Mou zongsan's thinking context and theoretical development

Given Theory or Satisfied Theory——a Query about Mou Zongsan's Explanation of Moral Happiness Illustrated by Theory of Being

Some Doubts about Mu Zongsan's Ethic Existentialism

On the Mou Zongsan's Exploration of Practical Wisdom Doctrine

Who Was More Similar to Kant,Mencius or Zhu Xi——A Critical Inquiry of Mou Zongsan's Study of Kant

On When Mou Zansan's Thought of Self-Negation Origins

The Inherent Defects of Mou Zongsan's Transcendent Being Theory

Three Basic Elements in the Concept of "Self-negation"

Mou Zongsan's Philosophical Identification and Construction of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism, and the Judgment of Perfect Doctrine

Significance and Defects of Mou Tsung-san's the Highest Good Thought

Theoretical Significance and Methodological Weakness in MOU Tsung-san's Ontology

Some Points about the Concept of "nature" in Kant's Philosophy and Aesthetics:Concurrently As Complement and Discussion with Mr. Liu Wei-qin's Views

Zizek and his criticism of the aesthetics of sublime by Imanuel Kant