Abstract:I use here the concept of German Idealists in a broad sense, including Kant, Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel, but will restrict my examination of contemporary New Confucians only to Mou Zongsan (牟宗三 1909–1995) and Tang Junyi (唐君毅 1909–1978). The latter two are central figures of Contemporary Neo-Confucianism in twentieth century and above all they have many connections with the German Idealists in the development of their philosophy. At first sight it seems that Mou’s thought orients more on Kant than Hegel. Mou himself is an excellent Kant interpreter. His new transformation of Chinese philosophy starts from a critique of Kant, for example in his main works, Appearance and Thing-in-itself and Intellectual Intuition and Chinese Philosophy. On the contrary Tang’s seems to be more Hegelian than Kantian. But the distinction between Mou (Kant) and Tang (Hegel) lies in the following two features. In the first place Hegel and Tang evolve their systems by means of one single concept (for Hegel, Spirit, and for Tang Junyi, Mind). Secondly, their systems can be subsumed under a common theoretical model, namely monism (one is all).The question I am concerned with here is the following: How far does the thought of German Idealists influence the development of the philosophical systems of Mou and Tang? The influence of German Idealists can be divided into two perspectives: (1) the perspective of the historical interpretation of Confucianism, between Mou’s three-lineage doctrine (三系說) and Tang’s one-lineage doctrine (一系說); (2) the perspective of construction of universal philosophy or I will call it “philosophy of all philosophies.” This chapter attempts to retrace exactly the sources of German Idealism and to make clear how these sources affect their philosophical development.

Kantian “ Intellectual Intuition ” and Intellectual Intuition as Understood by Mou Zongsan

Theoretical Significance of Mou Zongsan's "Self-Intuition"

Intellectual Intuition and Moral Phenomenon:Mou Zongsan's Moral Ontology and Its Contributions to Western Philosophy

Questioning Mou Zongsan's Explanation of Kant's Thing-in-itself Concept

Why Does Mou Zongsan Believe that Kant’s Thing Itself is not A Concept of Fact

Who Was More Similar to Kant,Mencius or Zhu Xi——A Critical Inquiry of Mou Zongsan's Study of Kant

A Comparative Study of Kant, Mou Zongsan and Fu Weixun

Mou Zongsan's Philosophical Identification and Construction of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism, and the Judgment of Perfect Doctrine

The Ontological Implication of Mou Zongsan's "vertical Interpretation of Vertical Relationships"

"The Spiritual Eye"

The innate moral mind self-negation:Mou zongsan's thinking context and theoretical development

Sensation and Being Within the Horizons of Intuition of Essence--An Analysis of Husserl's Thinking of Intuition

On the Mou Zongsan's Exploration of Practical Wisdom Doctrine

The Influence of the German Idealists on the Contemporary New Confucians

Theoretical Significance and Methodological Weakness in MOU Tsung-san's Ontology

The Inherent Defects of Mou Zongsan's Transcendent Being Theory

The Mechanism, Effectiveness and Working Condition of Intuition-based Decision---A Theoretical Framework

Some Points about the Concept of "nature" in Kant's Philosophy and Aesthetics:Concurrently As Complement and Discussion with Mr. Liu Wei-qin's Views

On When Mou Zansan's Thought of Self-Negation Origins

Horizontal System and Transcendental Being: On Mou Zongsan’s Theory of Transcending Being and Its Defects as Viewed from Zhu Xi

On New Intensionalism