The Influence of the German Idealists on the Contemporary New Confucians
Wen-berng Pong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56475-9_18
2020-12-18
Abstract:I use here the concept of German Idealists in a broad sense, including Kant, Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel, but will restrict my examination of contemporary New Confucians only to Mou Zongsan (牟宗三 1909–1995) and Tang Junyi (唐君毅 1909–1978). The latter two are central figures of Contemporary Neo-Confucianism in twentieth century and above all they have many connections with the German Idealists in the development of their philosophy. At first sight it seems that Mou’s thought orients more on Kant than Hegel. Mou himself is an excellent Kant interpreter. His new transformation of Chinese philosophy starts from a critique of Kant, for example in his main works, Appearance and Thing-in-itself and Intellectual Intuition and Chinese Philosophy. On the contrary Tang’s seems to be more Hegelian than Kantian. But the distinction between Mou (Kant) and Tang (Hegel) lies in the following two features. In the first place Hegel and Tang evolve their systems by means of one single concept (for Hegel, Spirit, and for Tang Junyi, Mind). Secondly, their systems can be subsumed under a common theoretical model, namely monism (one is all).The question I am concerned with here is the following: How far does the thought of German Idealists influence the development of the philosophical systems of Mou and Tang? The influence of German Idealists can be divided into two perspectives: (1) the perspective of the historical interpretation of Confucianism, between Mou’s three-lineage doctrine (三系說) and Tang’s one-lineage doctrine (一系說); (2) the perspective of construction of universal philosophy or I will call it “philosophy of all philosophies.” This chapter attempts to retrace exactly the sources of German Idealism and to make clear how these sources affect their philosophical development.