Abstract:The system of remanding judgment in civil litigation has aroused complaints among scholars,judges,lawyers and the public,which has rendered it necessary to amend the related articles in the Civil Procedure Law.As there is no essential consensus between scholars,judges and lawyers upon this system,it is necessary to develop an "ought to be" interpretation in law.In order to limit the abuse of discretion in remanding judgments in civil cases,Chinese courts have implemented an approach that stresses detailed procedures through local rules and enhances organizational management measures.Compared to the western countries' courts,Chinese courts are unique bureaucratic organizations that adjudication and(judicial) administration are integrated and the presidents have the overall responsibility for organizational performance such as judicial quality and efficiency and resources arrangement.However,such a model of "judicial procedure under the control of organizational management" can not avoid the appellate courts' abuse of discretion by remanding judgments against relevant statutory provisions,regardless of the appealed issues and without judicial reasoning,but instead deprives the litigating parties and the public in general of their participation in the civil procedures,thus damages further the authority of judicial adjudication. Of course,as Chinese judges lack enough professionalization and socialization,it is necessary and reasonable to strengthen and regulate organizational management of judicial adjudication in China nowadays.To adjust the relationship between judicial procedure and court organization,the autonomy of judicial procedure should be guaranteed in the background of organizational management and parties' participation in judicial procedure should be restored.The reasoning for remanding orders,which is bound by the appellants' claims and justified by judges themselves,is the key factor to guarantee the autonomy of adjudication.Therefore,the most important improvement about the remanding system should focus upon the judicial reasoning contained in orders in addition to amending the statutory conditions set forth for remanding.

On the Perfection of Revocation System of Arbitral Awards

Perfecting the Separating Power System in Property Right Reform

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

On the Non-Enforcement of Arbitral Award with Background ofRevising Civil Procedural Law: An Empirical Analysis inPractice Related to Beijing Arbitration Commission

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

On Problems Concerning Establishment of Arbitration Institution in Current Arbitration Legal System of China and Its Consummation

Enforcing International Commercial Arbitral Awards: A Comparative Study Between China and the United States

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure

On Amendment of China’s Administrative Reconsideration Law

On Creditor's Right of Revocation

On Reflection and System Reconstruction of Anti-judicial Orientation of Administrative Reconsideration Procedure

Research on the Modernization of China Foreign Commercial Arbitration: From the Perspective of Building an International Commercial Arbitration Center

On the Reconstruction of the Rights Relief System of the Third Party in Civil Litigation: With the Proper Plaintiff in the Suit of the Third Party Outsider's Revocation as the Focus

The Legal Effect of Creditor's Right of revocation: A Reflection on the System and the Search for a Way Out

Research on Recent eform of ICSID Investment Arbitration Mechanism and China's Position

On Establishment of Invalid Affirmation Litigation System of Chinese Administrative Litigation

On the Creditor's Right of Revocation

A Reflection of the Reconciliation and Rectification System in Bankruptcy Law of China

On the Improvement of China’s Antidumping Judicial Review System

The New Progress in Chinese Arbitration Law

The Legal Structure and Practical Dilemma of the Establishment of the "Review System"