Abstract:The system of remanding judgment in civil litigation has aroused complaints among scholars,judges,lawyers and the public,which has rendered it necessary to amend the related articles in the Civil Procedure Law.As there is no essential consensus between scholars,judges and lawyers upon this system,it is necessary to develop an "ought to be" interpretation in law.In order to limit the abuse of discretion in remanding judgments in civil cases,Chinese courts have implemented an approach that stresses detailed procedures through local rules and enhances organizational management measures.Compared to the western countries' courts,Chinese courts are unique bureaucratic organizations that adjudication and(judicial) administration are integrated and the presidents have the overall responsibility for organizational performance such as judicial quality and efficiency and resources arrangement.However,such a model of "judicial procedure under the control of organizational management" can not avoid the appellate courts' abuse of discretion by remanding judgments against relevant statutory provisions,regardless of the appealed issues and without judicial reasoning,but instead deprives the litigating parties and the public in general of their participation in the civil procedures,thus damages further the authority of judicial adjudication. Of course,as Chinese judges lack enough professionalization and socialization,it is necessary and reasonable to strengthen and regulate organizational management of judicial adjudication in China nowadays.To adjust the relationship between judicial procedure and court organization,the autonomy of judicial procedure should be guaranteed in the background of organizational management and parties' participation in judicial procedure should be restored.The reasoning for remanding orders,which is bound by the appellants' claims and justified by judges themselves,is the key factor to guarantee the autonomy of adjudication.Therefore,the most important improvement about the remanding system should focus upon the judicial reasoning contained in orders in addition to amending the statutory conditions set forth for remanding.

On Establishment of Invalid Affirmation Litigation System of Chinese Administrative Litigation

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

On Examining Legality of Regulatory Documents in Administrative Litigation

The Status Quo, Problems and Construction of the System of Administrative Action Null and Void in China

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

Institution of Invalidation of Acts in Action in Civil Law System--the Review of Three Legal Texts

Litigations Without a Ruling: the Predicament of Administrative Law in China

Judicial Review System of the abstract administrative Act and Its Improvement In China

A Study on the Administrative Public Interest Litigation System

Rethinking and Reconstruction of the Connection Mechanism between Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation

Law Control on the Administrative Free Judgment

Analysis of Impact from Administrative Reconsideration on Administrative Litigation

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)

On the Abiding Force of Administrative Action on Civil Adjudication

The Legal Structure and Practical Dilemma of the Establishment of the "Review System"

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure

On Amendment of China’s Administrative Reconsideration Law