Abstract:The system of remanding judgment in civil litigation has aroused complaints among scholars,judges,lawyers and the public,which has rendered it necessary to amend the related articles in the Civil Procedure Law.As there is no essential consensus between scholars,judges and lawyers upon this system,it is necessary to develop an "ought to be" interpretation in law.In order to limit the abuse of discretion in remanding judgments in civil cases,Chinese courts have implemented an approach that stresses detailed procedures through local rules and enhances organizational management measures.Compared to the western countries' courts,Chinese courts are unique bureaucratic organizations that adjudication and(judicial) administration are integrated and the presidents have the overall responsibility for organizational performance such as judicial quality and efficiency and resources arrangement.However,such a model of "judicial procedure under the control of organizational management" can not avoid the appellate courts' abuse of discretion by remanding judgments against relevant statutory provisions,regardless of the appealed issues and without judicial reasoning,but instead deprives the litigating parties and the public in general of their participation in the civil procedures,thus damages further the authority of judicial adjudication. Of course,as Chinese judges lack enough professionalization and socialization,it is necessary and reasonable to strengthen and regulate organizational management of judicial adjudication in China nowadays.To adjust the relationship between judicial procedure and court organization,the autonomy of judicial procedure should be guaranteed in the background of organizational management and parties' participation in judicial procedure should be restored.The reasoning for remanding orders,which is bound by the appellants' claims and justified by judges themselves,is the key factor to guarantee the autonomy of adjudication.Therefore,the most important improvement about the remanding system should focus upon the judicial reasoning contained in orders in addition to amending the statutory conditions set forth for remanding.

The Legal Structure and Practical Dilemma of the Establishment of the "Review System"

District Circuit Court: An Approach of Realism——An Analysis Based on Death Penalty Review Process

Review on the Inefficiency and Disorganization of Judicial Power

The Build of Three-level Court and the Reform of Retrial Procedure in China

Judicial Review System in Perspective of State Governance System Modernization--Improving Current Administrative Procedure Law as Center

Improving the Full Review of the Criminal Trial of Second Instance

Judicial Review System of the abstract administrative Act and Its Improvement In China

On the Up-building of Criminal Pretrial Review System in China--Expectation under the Revision of the Criminal Procedure Law

The Present Situation of Abstract Administrative Action Supervision in Our country and the Construction of Judicial Review

The People's Court in Transition: the Prospects of the Chinese Judicial Reform

Establishing Judicial Review in China

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure

Several Issue Discussions of Reform of System of Procedure for Supervision Upon Adjudication of Our Country

On China's Judicial Review System

On the Procedural Designing of Review Mechanism on Civil Trials

The Internal Personnel Structure of Chinese Judicature:the Basic Position & Realistic Pathway of the Reform

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

Focus on the Judicial Reform Suggestions on the Judicial Reform

A Study on the Long-effect System of Properly Handling Appeals on Legal Issues

On the Perfection and Development of the System of Administrative Litigation--the Conception of Revising the Administrative Procedure Law

Orientation and Prospect of Administrative Reconsideration System in New Era