Abstract:The system of remanding judgment in civil litigation has aroused complaints among scholars,judges,lawyers and the public,which has rendered it necessary to amend the related articles in the Civil Procedure Law.As there is no essential consensus between scholars,judges and lawyers upon this system,it is necessary to develop an "ought to be" interpretation in law.In order to limit the abuse of discretion in remanding judgments in civil cases,Chinese courts have implemented an approach that stresses detailed procedures through local rules and enhances organizational management measures.Compared to the western countries' courts,Chinese courts are unique bureaucratic organizations that adjudication and(judicial) administration are integrated and the presidents have the overall responsibility for organizational performance such as judicial quality and efficiency and resources arrangement.However,such a model of "judicial procedure under the control of organizational management" can not avoid the appellate courts' abuse of discretion by remanding judgments against relevant statutory provisions,regardless of the appealed issues and without judicial reasoning,but instead deprives the litigating parties and the public in general of their participation in the civil procedures,thus damages further the authority of judicial adjudication. Of course,as Chinese judges lack enough professionalization and socialization,it is necessary and reasonable to strengthen and regulate organizational management of judicial adjudication in China nowadays.To adjust the relationship between judicial procedure and court organization,the autonomy of judicial procedure should be guaranteed in the background of organizational management and parties' participation in judicial procedure should be restored.The reasoning for remanding orders,which is bound by the appellants' claims and justified by judges themselves,is the key factor to guarantee the autonomy of adjudication.Therefore,the most important improvement about the remanding system should focus upon the judicial reasoning contained in orders in addition to amending the statutory conditions set forth for remanding.

On Amendment of China’s Administrative Reconsideration Law

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

On Clause Design for Land Contracting Management Right in Real Right Law

Orientation and Prospect of Administrative Reconsideration System in New Era

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

On the Reconsiderability of Administrative Guidance

On the Judgement of Public Interests of Administrative Requisition

The Possibility of Reconciliation in Administrative Procedure in Legal Criterion——A Perspective of Legal Interpretation

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

On Reflection and System Reconstruction of Anti-judicial Orientation of Administrative Reconsideration Procedure

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

Analysis of Impact from Administrative Reconsideration on Administrative Litigation

Rethinking and Reconstruction of the Connection Mechanism between Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure

Discourse on the Legislative Improvement of China Administrative Approval System

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts

Several Issues on the Reform of Criminal Procedure

Study on the reform dilemma and reform path of administrative examination and approval bureau

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action