Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

On the Reconsiderability of Administrative Guidance

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Analysis of Impact from Administrative Reconsideration on Administrative Litigation

The Possibility of Reconciliation in Administrative Procedure in Legal Criterion——A Perspective of Legal Interpretation

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Orientation and Prospect of Administrative Reconsideration System in New Era

On the Judgement of Public Interests of Administrative Requisition

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

On Amendment of China’s Administrative Reconsideration Law

Rethinking and Reconstruction of the Connection Mechanism between Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

On Reflection and System Reconstruction of Anti-judicial Orientation of Administrative Reconsideration Procedure

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

Study on Issue of Administrative Reconsideration Case Accepting Standard Considering Thethird Sector As Respondent

On the Abiding Force of Administrative Action on Civil Adjudication

Comparative Study on the Cross-Strait Administrative Reconsiderations

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

On the Legitimacy of Bringing Complaints into Administrative Reconsideration

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit