Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

Study on Issue of Administrative Reconsideration Case Accepting Standard Considering Thethird Sector As Respondent

On the Judgement of Public Interests of Administrative Requisition

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

Analysis of Impact from Administrative Reconsideration on Administrative Litigation

On the Reconsiderability of Administrative Guidance

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

Orientation and Prospect of Administrative Reconsideration System in New Era

A Tentative Exploration into the Feasibility of Administration of Justice's Interference with Domestic Violence

Rethinking and Reconstruction of the Connection Mechanism between Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation

On the Legitimacy of Bringing Complaints into Administrative Reconsideration

On perfecting the law system of administrative reconsideration

On Amendment of China’s Administrative Reconsideration Law

On the Reconstruction of the Rights Relief System of the Third Party in Civil Litigation: With the Proper Plaintiff in the Suit of the Third Party Outsider's Revocation as the Focus

Comparative Study on the Cross-Strait Administrative Reconsiderations

On Reflection and System Reconstruction of Anti-judicial Orientation of Administrative Reconsideration Procedure

Administration: Reconsideration of the Theory of Relation Between a Country and Its Citizen Society

The Discussion of Administrative Case Trialing off-site

On Enlargement of the Scope of Accepting Cases in Administrative Actions