On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

Zhang Jiansheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2011.01.012
2011-01-01
Abstract:"Non-performance"of"Administrative Procedure Law"Article 54,paragraph 3 means the executive authorities in a negative way without any intention,and"no answer";and"delayed discharge"is a situation that the statutory or administrative organ do not end the administrative procedures within a legal or reasonable period of time.In the way of judgment to perform statutory duty,the"Administrative Procedure Law"only contains"procedural judge"in content,however it based on philosophy of administrative relief for the administrative counterpart to provide economic,effective.When"the Administrative Procedure Law"is revised in the future,it should recognize the"substantive judgment"legitimacy of judgments to perform duties as an exemption."Administrative omission"does not of course violate administrative law;therefore it is different from"non - performance statutory duties."To the"refusal to perform"administrative act,the Court should annul and redo the judgment.In order to reduce the possible"tired litigation"of administrative counterpart, the court can add certain restrictive"instructions"for administrative organ in redo judgment.It is helpful that pay attention to the situations like"refusal to perform"for the Court to fulfill its statutory duty to judge correctly.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?