Abstract:The concept of due process, inspired by Anglo-American law, has become well knew to the Chinese legal circles and been adopted in a number of legislations. However, when laws,regulations, and rules do not provide clear process requirements for administrative organs, it is still uncertain whether the judiciary can apply the due process principle in reviewing the legality of administrative acts or not, given that the Administrative Litigation Law 1989 stipulates that an administrative act in violation of statutory process should be void. By statistically analyzing the legal basis invoked in the administrative rulings in law reports and analyzing more than ten representative cases concerning administrative process, as well as the interviews with judges, this article reviews the development of the due process principle in judicial practice of China. Over a period of more than ten years, judicial awareness and confidence of the due process principle has been strengthened, and the legitimacy of judges' application of this principle has been enhanced as well. The "violation of statutory process" provision, which has become a crucial basis for judicial review of administrative acts, provides a channel for the due process principle to be introduced into judicial practice. Judges' conception of due process has also been jointly shaped by various extra-statutory factors, such as scholars' introduction and advocacy, standard legislations, judicial precedents and the government's emphasis on law- based administration. Through the ripple effects of innovative rulings on similar cases, the judicial application of due process principle has been widely acknowledged and the principle begins to be incorporated into law. This fact suggests that, even despite its limited power, Chinese judiciary has demonstrated its activist stance and potential in upholding justice and developing law. However, due to the lack of judicial authority and respect for judicial precedents, judiciary innovations in individual cases cannot yet yield a predictable, nationwide impact. The dawn of the due process principle has come, but there will be a significant period of time before the principle reaches full ascendancy.

On the Abiding Force of Administrative Action on Civil Adjudication

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

Litigations Without a Ruling: the Predicament of Administrative Law in China

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

How the Courts Develop Administrative Law

On the Application of Administrative Doctrine by Judge

On the Litigability of Administrative Litigation for Punishment of Breach of Faith Chinese Full Text

Contemporary or Lasting?——A Administrative Law Perspective for CAR Ban

Citizens' Disregard of Illegal Administrative Acts

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

Should the Principle of Mediation Be Established in Administrative Litigation

Some Indications of Due Process Principle in Judicial Judgments of China

The Dawn of the Due Process Principle in China

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

On the induction of juridical modification in the case of Administrative arbitrament for the house backout

The Public Deciding Force of Administrative Action and Impairment of Public Affairs