Abstract:The 16 effective administrative adjudication systems in the counting time are distributed mainly in three fields,which are natural resources and environment,intellectual property,and civil disputes.They are all created by the laws,administrative regulations and ministry rules of the central government.However,the sphere of administrative adjudication is gradually diminishing.Those created administrative adjudications are abolished one after the other,and new laws prefer to stipulate mediation or arbitration.Implementary rules of administrative adjudication mainly focus on adjudications involved in land,most of which are enacted by the local governments.The local governments not only make numerous implementary rules,but also specific ones.But in fields such as mineral rights,environment,intellectual property and civil disputes,the local governments do not play their part of detailing administrative adjudication systems stipulated by law,administrative regulations and ministry rules,let alone enact specific rules.Documents on administrative norms of administrative adjudication highly concentrate on land compensation,demolition compensation and woodland property.Among these adjudications,there are more documents on administrative norms concerning woodland property from the central government,and more documents on administrative norms concerning land compensation and demolition compensation from the local governments.The contents of these documents focus on disputes resolution instead of the adjudication system itself.In retrospection of the litigations invoked by administrative adjudication,the adjudication systems of land compensation,demolition compensation and woodland property are all in operation,while other types of adjudication systems are hardly in operation.Among these three domains,the adjudication of demolition compensation is exceedingly active,but the adjudication of land compensation is very inactive.The statistic coupling is that,when the local governments enact specific implementary rules,the administrative adjudication systems are in operation.Otherwise,they would have stagnated.The frequency of being applied for local documents of administrative norms as the authority of an administrative adjudication system is proportional to the activeness of the administrative adjudication.Undoubtedly,the justification or falsification of this conclusion is subject to another research.

On the induction of juridical modification in the case of Administrative arbitrament for the house backout

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

The Possibility of Reconciliation in Administrative Procedure in Legal Criterion——A Perspective of Legal Interpretation

On the Abiding Force of Administrative Action on Civil Adjudication

On the Res Iudicata of Administrative Litigation Judgment

A Study on the Justification of Arbitration Bases

On the Modification of The Administrative Procedure Law and the Concept of Administration Under Rule of Law

The Discussion of Administrative Case Trialing off-site

Analysis of Impact from Administrative Reconsideration on Administrative Litigation

Regular pattern of judicial decision on land acquisition and resettlement: An investigation on Zhejiang’s 901 administrative litigation cases

Administrative Adjudication: A Systematic Push from Local Governments

On the Direction,Points and Scheme of the Revision of China's Adminsitrative Procedure Law——An Expert Recommended Draft of the Adminsitrative Procedure Law from Renmin University of China

On the Non-Enforcement of Arbitral Award with Background ofRevising Civil Procedural Law: An Empirical Analysis inPractice Related to Beijing Arbitration Commission

On Judicial Review of Abstract Administrative Act in China

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure

The Uncertainty of Administrative Adjudication and Its Solution

The Application Dilemma and Countermeasures in Confirming Illegal Judgments in Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation