On the Non-Enforcement of Arbitral Award with Background ofRevising Civil Procedural Law: An Empirical Analysis inPractice Related to Beijing Arbitration Commission

Wang Yaxin,Chen Fuyong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16092/j.cnki.1001-618x.2012.05.024
2012-01-01
Abstract:There is much debate currently on how to revise the grounds for non-enforcing arbitral award stipulated in article 213 of China civil procedural law. To provide beneficial reference for related discussion, it is necessary to do an empirical analysis of the first-hand data from the arbitration and judicial practice. Study on rulings concerned with the non-enforcement of the awards issued by Beijing Arbitration Commission from 1995 to 2010 expresses that factors illustrating the non-enforcement of an award are diverse. From the perspective of practice, at least the ground related to fact finding stipulated in Article 213 (4) should be changed into "falsifying or concealing evidence" which is stipulated as grounds of setting aside award in Article 58 of China arbitration law.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?