Abstract:This article examines international commercial arbitration, one of the most popular methods for the resolution of disputes that arise in the context of international commercial relations. The volume of trade between Russia and China has been gradually increasing in recent years, which testifies to the fact that the study of international commercial arbitration legal regulation in both nations is extremely relevant. The authors examine the concept of international commercial arbitration entities, as well as the sources of legal regulation that govern their establishment and operation in Russia and Mainland China. In addition, the procedures for case consideration, the elaboration of arbitration agreements, the rules for the creation of an arbitration commission, the requirements for arbitral awards and other aspects are investigated. The authors come to the conclusion that the regulations governing international commercial arbitration are similar in the two countries and are based on international law and national legal acts. Both Russia and China have adopted the norms outlined in the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law into their legal systems although to different degrees. Both countries provide similar arbitration agreement norms and support the arbitration clause autonomy principle. The difference lies in the fact that China does not follow the competence-competence principle (the arbitrators’ power to determine their own competence to consider a certain dispute). Instead, the issue is referred either to the arbitration commission or to the state court for resolution. On the other hand, arbitrators in Russia have the right to determine their competence by themselves. According to Chinese law, a party requires arbitration court mediation in order to be able to submit a request for provisional protection measures to the state court, while under Russian law adirect request is allowed. In China, the norms for the recognition and enforcement of aforeign arbitration award by the court do not provide for the court’s ruling to be challenged; the refusal of the recognition and enforcement shall be possible only after the award has been considered by the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. In Russia, the legislation allows for both challenging and refusing the decision to recognize and enforce the award.

Enforcing International Commercial Arbitral Awards: A Comparative Study Between China and the United States

A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Regulation of International Commercial Arbitration in Russia and Mainland China

On the Foreign Arbitral awards Dispute without Foreign Elements

On the Non-Enforcement of Arbitral Award with Background ofRevising Civil Procedural Law: An Empirical Analysis inPractice Related to Beijing Arbitration Commission

An Empirical Study on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan Arbitral Awards in Mainland China

International Civil Litigation in China: A Practical Analysis of the Chinese Judicial System

The Legal System of Concurrence of International Parallel Litigation of the U. S. A. Federal Court

On the Choice of Law in International Commercial Arbitration

Chronology of Practice: Chinese Practice in Private International Law in 2018

The Uncertainties in the Ascertainment of Foreign Law in Chinese Court: A Critical Analysis of the Current Mechanism

Chronology of Practice: Chinese Private International Law in 2018

The New Progress in Chinese Arbitration Law

On the Application of Jus Cogens in International Commercial Arbitration

On a Methodology for CISG's Application in China

An overview of Macao’s new arbitration law: provisional measures and recognition of arbitral awards

Enforcement of Awards v. Enforcement of Judgments in the EU: Arbitration Must Catch Up

The Application of General Principles of Law to Arbitrability in International Commercial Arbitration

On Problems Concerning Establishment of Arbitration Institution in Current Arbitration Legal System of China and Its Consummation

Jurisdiction agreements in Chinese conflict of laws: searching for ways to implement the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements in China

China’s International Commercial Court: Background, Obstacles and the Road Ahead

Conflict of Jurisdictions over Civil and Commercial Cases with Foreign Elements and Judicial Review