Abstract:Background The ex vivo study is to compare the root canal preparation outcomes achieved by five nickel–titanium single-file instrumentation systems (M3-L, Reciproc Blue, V-Taper 2H, WaveOne Gold, XP-endo Shaper) in severely curved molar root canals. Methods A total of 60 root canals were selected from extracted human molar teeth with curvatures ranging from 25° to 50° and divided into five groups based on the instrumentation system employed (n = 12). Before and after root canal preparation, a Micro-CT scan was taken, and pre- and post-operative data were analyzed to evaluate the following parameters: volume increment of root canals (VI), untouched root canal areas (UTA), and canal transportation (CT). Apically extruded debris (AD) was collected during preparation. After that, all samples were separated into two parts and examined respectively by scanning electron microscope (SEM) to assess cleaning ability. Data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA (UTA, AD, VI) or Kruskal–Wallis test (CT, SEM-score), the level of significance was set at α = 0.05. Results There were no significant differences between the five systems regarding the AD, VI, and UTA parameters ( P > 0.05). In terms of CT, no significant difference was noted at the straight section of canal and apical levels, while XP-endo Shaper showed less canal transportation than M3-L at the level of curved vertex ( P < 0.05), and the centering ability of V-Taper 2H was significantly better than WaveOne Gold at the initial point of bending ( P < 0.05). Debris and smear layers were present on the canal walls of all specimens, the apical thirds of the canal presented higher SEM scores than the coronal thirds in all groups ( P < 0.05). Reciproc Blue and XP-endo Shaper showed fewer smear scores than WaveOne Gold in the apical thirds ( P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively), and no statistical difference was found between other groups in the middle and coronal thirds. Conclusion The five single-file systems evaluated performed equally in apically debris extrusion, dentin removal, and untouched root canal areas, while XP-endo Shaper and V-Taper 2H resulted in less canal transportation compared to M3-L and WaveOne Gold. Regarding cleaning ability, Reciproc Blue and XP-endo Shaper were associated with less smear layer than WaveOne Gold in the apical thirds.

Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals

Comparative Assessment of the Shaping Ability of Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and ProTaper Gold in Simulated Root Canals

Gentlefile Versus Protaper in the Shaping Ability in Simulated J-shaped Root Canals

Evaluation of Root Dentinal Damage Associated with ProTaper Gold, WaveOne Gold, and ProTaper Next during Cleaning and Shaping Procedures: An In vitro Analysis

Shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems in combination with and without different glide path techniques in simulated curved canals

Assessment of Shaping Ability of ProTaper in Curved Canals

Comparative Study of Shaping Ability Between Rotary ProTaper and Flexofile

Shaping Ability of Progressive Versus Constant Taper Instruments in Simulated Root Canals

A comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals

Shaping ability of R-phase nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals

Shaping Ability of Progressive Versus Constant Taper Instruments in Curved Root Canals of Extracted Teeth.

Comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals: an ex vivo study

Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study

[Comparison of the Shaping Capability of Reciprocating Instruments in Simulated Canals in Vitro].

Comparative Evaluation of the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of WaveOne Gold in Reciprocation, ProGlider in Rotary Motion, and Manual Files in a Reciprocating Handpiece Within Simulated Curved Canals: An In Vitro Study

Assessment of Vertical Force Generated with Single File Systems during Shaping of Constricted Root Canals

A clinical comparation of the shaping abilities of the two types of rotary nickel-titanium instruments in molar canals

[Glide Path Management of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Simulated Root Canals].

Root Canal Shaping Effect of Instruments with Offset Mass of Rotation in the Mandibular First Molar: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study

Shaping ability of novel nickel-titanium systems in printed primary molars

Evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and centering ability in different nickel-titanium files during curved root canal preparation