Remarks on trigonometric functions after Eisenstein

P. L. Robinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.05034

2016-02-16

Abstract:We modify the Whittaker-Watson account of the Eisenstein approach to the trigonometric functions, basing these functions independently on the Eisenstein function $\varepsilon_2$.

Complex Variables

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

On the numerology of trigonometric polynomials

Hans-Christian Herbig,Mateus de Jesus Gonçalves

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.13604

2023-11-20

Abstract:This note is about the observation that the various transition formulas between bases of trigonometric polynomials can be expressed in terms binomial coefficients. More specifically, we write the entries of the Chebyshev matrices $ T$ and $ U$ in terms of binomial coefficients. We remark that the inverses of certain submatrices of the Chebyshev matrix $ T$ correspond to classical power reduction formulas for trigonometric functions. Therefore the entries of $ T^{-1}$ are expressible in terms of binomial coefficients and powers of two. The inverses of certain submatrices of the Chebyshev matrix $ U$ appear in power reduction formulas involving the Catalan triangles. We could not spot them in the literature. As a corollary the Catalan triangles are interpreted as inverses of rather natural matrices of binomial coefficients. We explain the matrix inversions in terms of Riordan arrays. We solve the integral $ \int _{0}^{2\pi }\cos^{2m}( x)\sin^{2n}( x) dx$ and deduce a hypergeometric identity from the Fourier expansion of $\cos^{2m}(x)$ and $ \sin^{2n}( x)$. As a corollary we prove that super Catalan numbers are integers. We emphasize that from the point of view of these base changes between the trigonometric polynomials it is more natural to work with $2\cos(x)$ and $2\sin(x)$ instead of $\cos(x)$ and $\sin(x)$, since the transition matrices become invertible over the integers. We do a similar analysis for the spread polynomials. This enables us to make a conjecture of Goh and Wildberger more precise. In this exposition we give a mostly self-contained account of the matter, the prerequisites just being four semesters of calculus, linear algebra, elementary complex variables and the residue theorem.

History and Overview
A tangential approach to trigonometry

P.L. Robinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.03140

2019-02-07

Abstract:We construct the complex tangent as a meromorphic function in the plane, using an approach developed by Weierstrass in his characterization of analytic functions that satisfy algebraic addition theorems.

Classical Analysis and ODEs
Note on a simple trigonometric equality

J.-P. Allouche

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-024-00840-7

2024-03-25

The Ramanujan Journal

Abstract:In a recent paper Vinay, Shweta, and Harshitha use Ramanujan's theta functions to prove several trigonometric equalities. Elementary proofs for some of these equalities were given by the author and Zeilberger, then for all but one by Berndt, Kim, and Zaharescu. The remaining equality was proved in the same paper of Berndt, Kim, and Zaharescu in a non-totally elementary way, in that it uses a result of Gauss in cyclotomy: here we give an elementary proof of the same equality. Also we show how to use automated tools to discover and prove some generalizations.

mathematics
$Ω$-theorem for short trigonometric sum

Jan Moser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.6775

2014-06-26

Abstract:We obtain in this paper new application of the classical E.C. Titchmarsh' discrete method (1934) in the theory of the Riemann $\zf$ - function. Namely, we shall prove the first localized $\Omega$-theorem for short trigonometric sum. This paper is the English version of the work of reference \cite{4}.

Classical Analysis and ODEs
Rational values of powers of trigonometric functions

Genki Shibukawa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.06583

2020-11-16

Abstract:We extend the theorem by Olmsted (1945) and Carlitz-Thomas (1963) on rational values of trigonometric functions to powers of trigonometric functions.

Number Theory
Whittaker coefficients of geometric Eisenstein series

Jeremy Taylor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/fms.2024.77

2024-10-18

Forum of Mathematics Sigma

Abstract:Geometric Langlands predicts an isomorphism between Whittaker coefficients of Eisenstein series and functions on the moduli space of -local systems. We prove this formula by interpreting Whittaker coefficients of Eisenstein series as factorization homology and then invoking Beilinson and Drinfeld's formula for chiral homology of a chiral enveloping algebra.

mathematics, applied
Elliptic functions in signature four

P.L. Robinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.04416

2021-07-06

Abstract:We explore the relationships between two elliptic functions constructed by Shen in the signature four Ramanujan theory.

Complex Variables,Number Theory
Ramanujan-Shen's differential equations for Eisenstein series of level 2

Masato Kobayashi

2024-04-14

Abstract:Ramanujan (1916) and Shen (1999) discovered differential equations for classical Eisenstein series. Motivated by them, we derive new differential equations for Eisenstein series of level 2 from the second kind of Jacobi theta function. This gives a new characterization of a system of differential equations by Ablowitz-Chakravarty-Hahn (2006), Hahn (2008), Kaneko-Koike (2003), Maier (2011) and Toh (2011). As application, we show some arithmetic results on Ramanujan's tau function.

Mathematics
Trigonometric inequalities and the Riemann zeta-function

Pace P. Nielsen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.14130

2022-10-26

Abstract:We very slightly improve the leading constant of the (currently best) proven asymptotic zero-free region of the Riemann zeta-function, by using an easy improvement to a trigonometric polynomial.

Number Theory
Some corrections to an old paper

E. Bombieri,J. B. Friedlander,H. Iwaniec

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.01371

2019-03-05

Abstract:We give some corrections of our paper "Primes in arithmetic progressions to large moduli"[BFI]. The corrections do not affect the statements of any of the theorems in the paper. The contents of our two sequel papers [BFI2, BFI3] also remain unchanged.

Number Theory
About rational-trigonometric deformation

V.N. Tolstoy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0212371

2002-12-30

Abstract:We consider a rational-trigonometric deformation in context of rational and trigonometric deformations. The simplest examples of these deformations are presented in different fields of mathematics. Rational-trigonometric differential Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov and dynamical equations are introduced.

Quantum Algebra,Mathematical Physics,Representation Theory
On the Iwasawa theory of elliptic curves at Eisenstein primes

Francesc Castella

2024-04-19

Abstract:These are expanded notes for the mini-course given by the author at the 2022 ICTS workshop `Elliptic curves and the special values of $L$-functions'.

Number Theory
A remark on modular equations involving Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction via $5$-dissections

Russelle Guadalupe

2024-10-18

Abstract:In this paper, we study the $5$-dissections of certain Ramanujan's theta functions, particularly $\psi(q)\psi(q^2), \varphi(-q)$ and $\varphi(-q)\varphi(-q^2)$, and derive an identity for $q(q;q)_{\infty}^6/(q^5;q^5)_{\infty}^6$ in terms of certain products of the Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction $R(q)$. Using this identity, we give another proof of the modular equation involving $R(q), R(q^2)$ and $R(q^4)$, which was recorded by Ramanujan in his lost notebook, and establish modular equations involving $R(q), R(q^2), R(q^4), R(q^8)$ and $R(q^{16})$.

Number Theory,Combinatorics
Eisenstein congruences among Euler systems

Óscar Rivero,Victor Rotger

2023-06-08

Abstract:We investigate Eisenstein congruences between the so-called Euler systems of Garrett--Rankin--Selberg type. This includes the cohomology classes of Beilinson--Kato, Beilinson--Flach and diagonal cycles. The proofs crucially rely on different known versions of the Bloch--Kato conjecture, and are based on the study of the Perrin-Riou formalism and the comparison between the different $p$-adic $L$-functions.

Number Theory
Cayley-Sylvester invariants and the Hamilton equations

P.L. Robinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1505.02273

2015-05-09

Abstract:We note implications of the Cayley-Sylvester theory of invariants and covariants for the Hamilton equations generated by cubic and quartic Hamiltonian functions.

Symplectic Geometry
The Dixonian elliptic functions

P.L. Robinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.04296

2019-01-08

Abstract:We offer a careful development of the Dixonian elliptic functions with parameter $\alpha = 0$ from the initial value problem of which they are solutions.

Complex Variables
Addendum on 'Natural number dynamics: reconstructing physics from generalized atomicity'

T. R. Robinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad74ba

2024-09-01

European Journal of Physics

Abstract:The derivation of the Schr ̈odinger equation is revisited with partic- ular emphasis on the role of the Riccati equation and the relationship between the Hamiltonian and natural number operators.

physics, multidisciplinary,education, scientific disciplines
Eisenstein Series on Metaplectic Covers and Multiple Dirichlet Series

Yanze Chen

2024-11-20

Abstract:We computed the first Whittaker coefficient of an Eisenstein series on a global metaplectic group induced from the torus and related the result with a Weyl group multiple Dirichlet series attached to the (dual) root system of the group under a mild assumption on the root system and the degree of the metaplectic cover. This confirms a conjecture of Brubaker-Bump-Friedberg.

Number Theory,Representation Theory
Newton on the equiangular spiral: An addendum to Erlichson's account

Curtis Wilson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.1994.1018

IF: 0.306

1994-05-01

Historia Mathematica

Abstract:In a recent article Herman Erlichson called attention to a flaw in Newton's proof of Proposition IX of Book I of the Principia. How did Newton fall into this error? A valid proof was near to hand, by an easy addition to Lemma III of Book II; but evidently Newton wished to attempt a different line of argument. The figure for Proposition IX in the first two editions of the Principia differs from that in the third edition, and does not involve the quadrilateral “given in kind” that Erlichson rightly objects to. But the basic error remains: the assumption without proof of the similarity of all segments of the spiral with the same central angle. By 1671 Newton had proved this assumption by an integration, establishing the logarithmic property of the equiangular spiral. In Proposition IX it would thus appear that he either simply presented as known an analytic result now familiar to himself, or hoped that his readers would consider it as valid for infinitesimal segments.

history & philosophy of science,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications

Remarks on trigonometric functions after Eisenstein

On the numerology of trigonometric polynomials

A tangential approach to trigonometry

Note on a simple trigonometric equality

$Ω$-theorem for short trigonometric sum

Rational values of powers of trigonometric functions

Whittaker coefficients of geometric Eisenstein series

Elliptic functions in signature four

Ramanujan-Shen's differential equations for Eisenstein series of level 2

Trigonometric inequalities and the Riemann zeta-function

Some corrections to an old paper

About rational-trigonometric deformation

On the Iwasawa theory of elliptic curves at Eisenstein primes

A remark on modular equations involving Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction via $5$-dissections

Eisenstein congruences among Euler systems

Cayley-Sylvester invariants and the Hamilton equations

The Dixonian elliptic functions

Addendum on 'Natural number dynamics: reconstructing physics from generalized atomicity'

Eisenstein Series on Metaplectic Covers and Multiple Dirichlet Series

Newton on the equiangular spiral: An addendum to Erlichson's account