Comparison between Direct and Indirect Heat Flux Measurement Techniques: Preliminary Laboratory Tests

Luca Evangelisti,Leone Barbaro,Claudia Guattari,Edoardo De Cristo,Roberto De Lieto Vollaro,Francesco Asdrubali

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122961

IF: 3.2

2024-06-17

Energies

Abstract:Direct and indirect approaches can be employed for estimating the heat flow through components in different application fields. In the building sector, the thermometric method is often applied by professionals for thermal transmittance evaluations. However, miscalculations can derive from inaccurate total heat transfer coefficients, and a consensus regarding the appropriate value to employ remains to be determined. Here, an apparatus was realized for laboratory tests and heat flux measurements were performed following direct and indirect approaches. Data acquired through a common heat flow sensor were compared with those computed through a post-processing based on radiative and convective estimations. The results were affected by the specific correlation adopted for computing the convective coefficients, with the percentage differences ranging from −9.8% to −0.4%. New measurement systems could be designed for automatically computing heat fluxes through indirect approaches, thus providing alternative solutions in the panorama of non-destructive tests for building energy diagnosis.

energy & fuels

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the comparison and evaluation between direct and indirect heat - flow measurement techniques in the field of architecture. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to compare the performance of direct measurement methods (such as using heat - flow sensors) and indirect measurement methods (such as heat metering methods based on temperature measurement and subsequent data processing) in estimating the heat flow through building components through laboratory tests. The paper points out that in the field of architecture, professionals often use heat metering methods for thermal conductivity evaluation, but due to the inaccuracy of the overall heat transfer coefficient, miscalculation may occur. In addition, there is no consensus on which appropriate heat transfer coefficient value should be adopted. Therefore, by implementing an experimental device, the paper carried out preliminary laboratory tests, aiming to provide experimental evidence to support a new indirect method, which can reduce the subjectivity of users in choosing the heat transfer coefficient, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of heat - flow measurement.