Abstract:Purpose: Augmentation of pedicle screws is recommended in selected indications (for instance: osteoporosis). Generally, there are two techniques for pedicle screw augmentation: inserting the screw in the non cured cement and in situ-augmentation with cannulated fenestrated screws, which can be applied percutaneously. Most of the published studies used an axial pull out test for evaluation of the pedicle screw anchorage. However, the loading and the failure mode of pullout tests do not simulate the cranio-caudal in vivo loading and failure mechanism of pedicle screws. The purpose of the present study was to assess the fixation effects of different augmentation techniques (including percutaneous cement application) and to investigate pedicle screw loosening under physiological cyclic cranio-caudal loading. Methods: Each of the two test groups consisted of 15 vertebral bodies (L1-L5, three of each level per group). Mean age was 84.3 years (SD 7.8) for group 1 and 77.0 years (SD 7.00) for group 2. Mean bone mineral density was 53.3 mg/cm3 (SD 14.1) for group 1 and 53.2 mg/cm3 (SD 4.3) for group 2. 1.5 ml high viscosity PMMA bone cement was used for all augmentation techniques. For test group 1, pedicles on the right side of the vertebrae were instrumented with solid pedicle screws in standard fashion without augmentation and served as control group. Left pedicles were instrumented with cannulated screws (Viper cannulated, DePuy Spine) and augmented. For test group 2 pedicles on the left side of the vertebrae were instrumented with cannulated fenestrated screws and in situ augmented. On the right side solid pedicle screws were augmented with cement first technique. Each screw was subjected to a cranio-caudal cyclic load starting at 20-50 N with increasing upper load magnitude of 0.1 N per cycle (1 Hz) for a maximum of 5000 cycles or until total failure. Stress X-rays were taken after cyclic loading to evaluate screw loosening. Results: Test group 1 showed a significant higher number of load cycles until failure for augmented screws compared to the control (4030 cycles, SD 827.8 vs. 1893.3 cycles, SD 1032.1; p < 0.001). Stress X-rays revealed significant less screw toggling for the augmented screws (5.2°, SD 5.4 vs. 16.1°, SD 5.9; p < 0.001). Test group 2 showed 3653.3 (SD 934) and 3723.3 (SD 560.6) load cycles until failure for in situ and cement first augmentation. Stress X-rays revealed a screw toggling of 5.1 (SD 1.9) and 6.6 (SD 4.6) degrees for in situ and cement first augmentation techniques (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Augmentation of pedicle screws in general significantly increased the number of load cycles and failure load comparing to the nonaugmented control group. For the augmentation technique (cement first, in situ augmented, percutaneously application) no effect could be exhibited on the failure of the pedicle screws. By the cranio-caudal cyclic loading failure of the pedicle screws occurred by screw cut through the superior endplate and the characteristic "windshield-wiper effect", typically observed in clinical practice, could be reproduced.

Craniocaudal toggling increases the risk of screw loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae

Relationship of Vertebral Body Bone Mineral Density with Insertional Torque and Pull-out Strengths of Pedicle Screws and Its Clinical Significance

Craniocaudal cyclic load improve risk assessment of lumbar pedicle screw loosening：finite element analysis based on computer tomography

Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.

Biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw: a finite element analysis

Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading

A Bicortical Pedicle Screw in the Cephalad Trajectory Is the Best Option for the Fixation of an Osteoporotic Vertebra: A Finite Element Study

Effects of osteoporosis on the biomechanics of various supplemental fixations co-applied with oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF): a finite element analysis

Superior cortical screw in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: A biomechanics and microstructure-based study.

Biomechanical effect of osteoporosis on sacral pedicle screws instrumentation

The Mismatch Between Bony Endplates and Grafted Bone Increases Screw Loosening Risk for OLIF Patients With ALSR Fixation Biomechanically

Biomechanical comparative study of midline cortical vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectory in osteoporotic bone

Biomechanical Effect of Different Posterior Fixation Techniques on Stability and Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Treating Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture With Osteoporosis: A Finite Element Analysis

Influence of Screw Length and Cement Position Within the Injured Vertebra on Fixation Strength in Short-Segment Fixation of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Pedicle Screw Fixation in Single-Level, Double-Level, or Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Fusion for Osteoporotic Spine: A Retrospective Study with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

The Effect of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis on Screw Loosening in MIS-TLIF and Dynamic Stabilization

The Anti-Loosening Characteristics of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws and Conventional Pedicle Screws under Different Bone Quality Conditions: a Comparative Study

Investigation of toggling effect on pullout performance of pedicle screws

Biomechanical effect of the extent of vertebral body fracture on the thoracolumbar spine with pedicle screw fixation: an in vitro study.

Pedicle screw augmentation in posterior constructs of the thoracolumbar spine: How many pedicle screws should be augmented?

Impact of screw tip design on screw anchorage: mechanical testing and numerical simulation