Bone-Mounted Robotic System in Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery for Osteoporosis Patients: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes
Yu-Feng Su,Tai-Hsin Tsai,Ann-Shung Lieu,Chih-Lung Lin,Chih-Hui Chang,Cheng-Yu Tsai,Hui-Yuan Su
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S359538
IF: 3.829
2022-04-23
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Abstract:Yu-Feng Su, 1, 2 Tai-Hsin Tsai, 1, 3 Ann-Shung Lieu, 1, 3, 4 Chih-Lung Lin, 1– 3 Chih-Hui Chang, 1, 2 Cheng-Yu Tsai, 4– 6 Hui-Yuan Su 1, 3 1 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 2 Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 3 Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 4 Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 5 Ph.D. Program in Environmental and Occupational Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University and National Health Research Institutes, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 6 Post Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Correspondence: Cheng-Yu Tsai; Hui-Yuan Su, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan, Tel +886-7-3215049, Fax +886-7-3215039, Email ; Purpose: Severe complications, including screw loosening events and low fusion rates, in spinal fusion surgery using the traditional open method are problematic. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the rate of screw loosening and the clinical outcomes of bone-mounted miniature robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in patients treated for degenerative spinal disease. Patients and Methods: Data were collected from the medical records of 118 patients (mean age, 69 years). Differences in clinical outcomes, including the Oswestry disability index, visual analog scale score, screw loosening rate, cage fusion rate, and complications, were evaluated among different bone mineral densities. Results: The screw loosening and cage fusion rates for all patients, normal bone mineral density, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups were 12%, 8.6%, 13.1%, and 14%, respectively, and 85.3%, 93%, 82.5%, and 81.4%, respectively. There was a higher screw loosening rate and a lower cage fusion rate in the osteopenia and osteoporosis groups than in the normal bone density group. The accuracy of the screw placement was 97.3%. There were no statistically significant differences in the Oswestry disability index and visual analog scale scores, and no major complications for dural tear or vascular or visceral injury. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated an acceptable screw loosening rate in patients with osteoporosis compared to that in patients with normal bone mineral density. The robotic system resulted in accurate screw placement in patients with osteoporosis. Keywords: robotic surgery, screw loosening rate, spinal fixation, spinal fusion, spinal fusion rate Pedicle screw insertion is an essential step for spinal fusion surgery and can offer strength for cage fusion. However, insertion of the transpedicle screw is associated with several complications such as screw loosening, screw pullout, and breakage. Screw loosening is a common complication, varying from less than 1% to 15% in non-osteoporotic patients and up to 60% in osteoporotic subjects. 1,2 The rate of screw loosening is significantly related to low bone quality in osteopenia and osteoporotic bones. 3 Various solutions have been suggested to reduce such events, including the use of conical pedicle screws, increase in the diameter and length of screws, use of expandable or coated pedicle screws, application of a cannulated pedicle screw for bone cement augmentation, and different screw insertion techniques such as bicortical fixation and cortical bone screw trajectory. 4 High screw loosening rate up to 54% was reported in open spine surgery by free-hand placement of pedicle screw. 5 For free-hand techniques, screw malposition rate of up to 29% is reported in the literature. A study using human lumbar vertebrae proved that lateral violation of the pedicle attenuated the biomechanical strength of the redirection screw, and the biomechanical data were correlated with bone mineral density. 6 Robot-assisted spine surgery has recently emerged as a viable tool to enable less invasive and higher-precision surgery. 7 Many studies have demonstrated that robot-assisted screw placement results in greater accuracy than conventional pedicle screw placement. 8–11 Most studies concerning robotic spinal surgery have discussed the accuracy of spinal instrumentation, 12 radiation exposure, 12 accessibility, cost-effectiveness, decrease in complication rate, and the learni -Abstract Truncated-
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology