Abstract:In Brief Study Design. An in vitro laboratory study. Objective. (i) To evaluate the effect of osteoporotic degree in determining the strength of sacral screw fixation and (ii) to compare the strength of unaugmented bicortical pedicle screw and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmented unicortical pedicle screw in sacral fixation. Summary of Background Data. Screw loosening is a clinical problem in lumbosacral fusions, especially in osteoporotic patients. To improve the screw anchoring strength of sacrum, bicortical and PMMA augmented sacral pedicle screw fixation techniques are widely used in clinical practice. However, the biomechanical strength of the bicortical and PMMA augmented sacral screw fixations remains undetermined in different degrees of osteoporosis. Methods. Twenty-five fresh osteoporotic cadavers were used in this study. According to the value of lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by DEXA, specimens were divided into 3 groups: group A (N = 9): BMD = 0.7 to 0.8 g/cm2, group B (N = 8): BMD = 0.6 to 0.7 g/cm2, and group C (N = 8): BMD < 0.6 g/cm2. In each specimen, S1 pedicle screw was inserted bicortically on the left side, and S1 pedicle screw with PMMA augmentation was inserted unicortically on the right side of the sacrum. Following a dynamic cyclic loading from 30 to 250 N on the screw head for 2000 cycles, the subsidence displacement and axial pull-out strength of each screw were measured. Results. No anchoring failure (defined as the subsidence displacement exceeding 2 mm within 2000 loading cycles) occurred in group A and B. However, in group C, 6 cases (75%) in bicortical fixation and 5 cases (63%) in PMMA augmented fixation failed during cyclic loading. In group A, no significant difference between the bicortical and PMMA augmented fixations was detected in terms of the subsidence and maximal pull-out strength. In group B, significantly less subsidence and higher maximal pull-out strength were demonstrated in the PMMA augmented technique than that in the bicortical fixation. Both techniques exhibited lower subsidence of the screw in group A than in group B. The bicortical technique exhibited higher maximum pull-out strength in group A than that in group B. However, statistical difference in terms of PMMA augmentation was not detected between group A and B. Conclusion. For BMD value more than 0.70 g/cm2, bicortical sacral pedicle screw fixation could obtain sufficient anchoring strength comparable with the PMMA augmented technique. When BMD value is within 0.6 to 0.7 g/cm2, the PMMA augmented technique would be more beneficial in improving the fixation strength than the bicortical fixation. For BMD values less than 0.6 g/cm2, early screw loosening may occur in both bicortical and PMMA augmented fixations. This study evaluates the effect of bone mineral density in determining the strength of sacral pedicle screw fixation and compares the strength of unaugmented bicortical pedicle screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical pedicle screws. The results show that, for patients with bone mineral density value between 0.6 and 0.7 g/cm2, the polymethylmethacrylate augmented fixation could provide stronger anchorage than unaugmented bicortical fixation.

Relationship of Vertebral Body Bone Mineral Density with Insertional Torque and Pull-out Strengths of Pedicle Screws and Its Clinical Significance

Biomechanical effect of osteoporosis on sacral pedicle screws instrumentation

Pedicle screw fixation strength: a biomechanical comparison between 4.5-mm and 5.5-mm diameter screws in osteoporotic upper thoracic vertebrae.

A Study of Screw Placement to Obtain the Optimal Pull-out Resistance of Lumbar Pedicle Screws—analysis of Hounsfield Units Measurements Based on Computed Tomography

Craniocaudal cyclic load improve risk assessment of lumbar pedicle screw loosening：finite element analysis based on computer tomography

The correlation between bone mineral density and surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

Superior cortical screw in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: A biomechanics and microstructure-based study.

Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Stability among Various Pedicle Screw Geometries: Effects of Screw Outer/Inner Projection Shape and Thread Profile

Value of different preoperative bone evaluation methods in predicting intraoperative screw insertion torque: a prospective clinical comparative trial

Effect of the Degree of Osteoporosis on the Biomechanical Anchoring Strength of the Sacral Pedicle Screws

Biomechanical comparative study of midline cortical vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectory in osteoporotic bone

A Bicortical Pedicle Screw in the Cephalad Trajectory Is the Best Option for the Fixation of an Osteoporotic Vertebra: A Finite Element Study

Effect of holding of the pedicle cortical bone on the fixation strength of the pedicle screw

Bone mineral density and bone mineral content in the lumbar vertebrae and the vetebra's biomechanical properties

Comparison of anchoring strengths in osteoporotic sacrum among different pedicle screws and bone cement augmentation

Effect of pedicle screw fixation with bone cement in lumbar

Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.

Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit-Based Prediction of Pedicle Screw Loosening after Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease.

Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw fixation strength among three different screw trajectories using single vertebrae and one-level functional spinal unit

Pedicle screw "hubbing" in the immature thoracic spine: a biomechanical and micro-computed tomography evaluation

Biomechanical comparison of 4 fixation techniques of sacral pedicle screw in osteoporotic condition.