Abstract:The available approaches to converting indentation diagrams into stress–strain curves are reviewed. It is noted that most studies on converting the instrumented indentation diagrams of a ball indenter into the stress–strain curves have been carried out within the uniform deformation limits using various computational and experimental approaches, including the finite element method and neural networks. In the authors' opinion, however, it is reasonable to perform the conversion of one diagram to another using the established relationship between indentation and tension deformations. This makes it possible not only to perform the conversion with a higher accuracy but also to evaluate the mechanical properties under tension from the indentation characteristics. The formulas most frequently used to determine plastic deformation contain a relative indentation diameter as the main parameter. Meanwhile, at the same relative indentation diameter and a constant ratio between the average contact pressure (Meyer hardness) and the true tensile stress, the indentation and tensile strain values can be significantly different owing to different strain hardening abilities of materials. The authors have established a relationship between the true elastoplastic deformation in the tensile tests and the relative depth of an unrecovered indentation obtained with a ball indenter with allowance for the strain hardening parameter determined from the instrumented indentation diagram. On the basis of the established relationship, a technique for converting the instrumented indentation diagram into a stress–strain curve in the uniform deformation region with the determination of the yield strength, tensile strength, and ultimate uniform tension has been developed. The technique has been verified by testing steels and aluminum, magnesium, and titanium alloys with strongly different Young's moduli, strength characteristics, plasticity, and strain hardening.

Representative Stress-Strain Curve by Spherical Indentation on Elastic-Plastic Materials

Stress–Strain Curve Estimation from Load–depth Curve of Spherical Indentation Test Based on Finite Element Analysis and Optimization

An Energy-Based Method to Extract Plastic Properties of Metal Materials from Conical Indentation Tests

Expansion of Spherical Cavity of Strain-Softening Materials with Different Elastic Moduli of Tension and Compression

Experimental Methodology for Obtaining the Flow Curve of Sheet Materials in a Wide Range of Strains

Spherical indentation method for estimating equibiaxial residual stress and elastic–plastic properties of metals simultaneously

Conversion of the kinetic indentation diagrams of ball indenter into stress-strain curves for metallic structural materials

Spherical Indentation into Elastoplastic Materials: Indentation-response Based Definitions of the Representative Strain

Simplified method to identify full von Mises stress-strain curve of structural metals

Determining plastic properties of a material with residual stress by using conical indentation

A simple stress field solution for conical indentation

A Critical Appraisal of the Instrumented Indentation Technique and Profilometry‐Based Inverse Finite Element Method Indentation Plastometry for Obtaining Stress–Strain Curves

Indentation Size Effect: A Study Via The Mechanism-Based Strain-Gradient Plasticity Theory

Identification of plastic properties through spherical indentation

Further Investigation on the Definition of the Representative Strain in Conical Indentation

Converting the Instrumented Indentation Diagrams of a Ball Indenter into the Stress–Strain Curves for Metallic Structural Materials

Modeling the Stress-Strain Curve of Elastic-Plastic Materials

Dependence of the Representative Strain on the Hardening Functions of Metallic Materials in Indentation

Research on Determining Elastic–Plastic Constitutive Parameters of Materials from Load Depth Curves Based on Nanoindentation Technology

Stress-Strain curves for solid polymers