Abstract:Abstract Instrumented indentation tests provide an attractive means for obtaining data to characterize the plastic response of engineering materials. One difficulty in doing this is that the relation between the measured indentation force versus indentation depth response and the plastic stress-strain response is not unique. Materials with very different uniaxial stress-strain curves can give essentially identical curves of indentation force versus indentation depth. Zhang et al. (2019, “Identification of Plastic Properties From Conical Indentation Using a Bayesian-Type Statistical Approach,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 86, p. 011002) numerically generated “experimental” conical indentation data and showed that using surface profile data and indentation force versus indentation depth data together with a Bayesian-type statistical analysis permitted the uniaxial plastic stress-strain response to be identified even for materials with indistinguishable indentation force versus indentation depth curves. The same form of hardening relation was used in the identification process as was used to generate the “experimental” data. Generally, a variety of power law expressions have been used to characterize the uniaxial plastic stress-strain response of engineering materials, and, of course, the form that gives the best fit for a material is not known a priori. Here, we use the same Bayesian statistics-based analysis but consider four characterizations of the plastic uniaxial stress-strain response and show that the identification of the hardening relation parameters and the associated uniaxial stress-strain response is not very sensitive to the form of the power law strain hardening relation chosen even with data that have significant noise.

Determining plastic properties of a material with residual stress by using conical indentation

A further study on representative models for calculating the residual stress based on the instrumented indentation technique

Influence of Assumed Strain Hardening Relation on Plastic Stress-Strain Response Identification From Conical Indentation

Identification of plastic properties through spherical indentation

Determination of Residual Stress and Yield Stress Simultaneously by Indentation Method with Dual Indenters

An Energy-Based Method to Extract Plastic Properties of Metal Materials from Conical Indentation Tests

Investigation of Residual Stress by the Indentation Method with the Flat Cylindrical Indenter

Identification of Material Properties Using Indentation Test and Shape Manifold Learning Approach

A Reverse Numerical Approach to Determine Elastic-plastic Properties of Multi-layer Material Systems with Flat Cylindrical Indenters

A novel method to extract the equi-biaxial residual stress and mechanical properties of metal materials by continuous spherical indentation test

Determination of Plastic Properties by Instrumented Spherical Indentation: Expanding Cavity Model and Similarity Solution Approach

Identification of Plastic Properties From Conical Indentation Using a Bayesian-Type Statistical Approach

Identification of Anisotropic Plasticity Properties of Materials Using Spherical Indentation Imprint Mapping

Spherical Indentation into Elastoplastic Materials: Indentation-response Based Definitions of the Representative Strain

On the Determination of the Anisotropic Plasticity of Metal Materials by Using Instrumented Indentation

A Critical Appraisal of the Instrumented Indentation Technique and Profilometry‐Based Inverse Finite Element Method Indentation Plastometry for Obtaining Stress–Strain Curves

Influence of Friction in Material Characterization in Microindentation Measurement.

A New Modified ECM Approach on the Identification of Plastic Anisotropic Properties by Spherical Indentation

Novel method for measuring surface residual stress using flat-ended cylindrical indentation

Identification of Elastic-Plastic Properties of Metal Materials by Using the Residual Imprint of Spherical Indentation

The Instrumented Indentation Methods for Determining Material Property