Abstract:In Korea, the penalty system was first stipulated in the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (the Monopoly Prohibition Act) in December 1980, but the definition of penalty is not immediately defined. Penalties have been stipulated as necessary in individual laws such as the Antimonopoly Act, but the concept was stipulated as a general provision in the Framework Act on Administration, which takes effect on March 23, 2021. Penalties are imposed as sanctions on persons who violate their obligations under laws and regulations (Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Framework Act on Administration), which is a monetary sanction. According to the contents of Article 28 (1) of the Framework Act on Administration and Article 8 of the Antimonopoly Act and the aforementioned theory, fines are imposed as "administrative sanctions" to deprive illegal profits acquired due to violations of obligations under economic laws, not the type of punishment. Therefore, it is possible to combine fines and punishment. Penalty has been introduced and implemented mainly in the field of economic law, but recently, legislation using the penalty system is expanding in the field of environmental law. In other words, if it violates the laws of the environmental law, it should be suspended, but instead of continuing the business without suspending the business due to the public interest of the business, the penalty system is used. In this paper, the general theory of the penalty system as administrative sanctions is reviewed, and based on this, the contents, types, and legislative improvements of the penalty prescribed in the environmental law are considered. In other words, the government intends to investigate and analyze the fines stipulated in individual laws in the environment sector by type, subject to imposition, imposition and collection procedures, legislative improvement measures to secure the effectiveness of fines, and establish a system dedicated to fines and civil servants.

Amendment and evaluation on criminal fine of food safety crime: Based on the comparison with criminal code of foreign countries

Improvement and Analysis on China’s Current Food Safety Information Disclosure System

Discussion on the Legal Liability Investigation Mechanisms for Food Safety Government Supervision

Research on Foreign Food Safety by Criminal Laws Regulations and its Realistic Inspiration

Food Safety Regulatory Enforcement in China: A Data-Driven Approach

Comparative Research on Criminal Law of Food Safety in Mainland and Macao

An empirical analysis of criminal sanctions against exam cheating in China

On Criminal Policy for Food Safety Crime from the Perspective of the Non-traditional Security

Probe on the Elderly Criminal Responsibility

The Criminal Code Amendments: Dimensions, Strategies, Evaluations and Contemplations

Criminal Compromise:A New Penalty Reform Notion

An Empirical Investigation into the Judicial Application of Article 96 of the Food Safety Law

From Magna Carta To The Contemporary System Of Financial Penalties In The Criminal Law

The Constitutional Debate of Punitive Damages in the United States——the Excessive Fines Clause and Punitive Damages in China

A Study on the Administrative Penalty System: Penalty under Environmental Law

Criminal Law Regulation of Food Safety Crime in the Perspective of the People's Livelihood Criminal Law

Studies on Public Security Penalties: a Comparison Between Germany, Taiwan and Mainland China

Water Pollution Crime Legislative Flaw and Consummation in China

An investigation into China’s online catering food safety governance efficacy based on the strategies of frequent supervision and strict penalty

Amendment of Criminal Law(9 th):Interpretation and Comment

Response on Principles of the Constitutional Human Rights about Penalty Structure Adjustment