Abstract:Government regulations have a substantial impact on food safety, both within China and elsewhere in the world. But regulatory research is hampered by a lack of systematic data. Much of the extant regulatory research is based on interpretations of government policy and regulatory announcements. At best, qualitative analysis indicates policy and regulatory intent, not enforcement, and it lacks precision and specificity. Using natural language processing (NLP), this study creates quantitative indicators of food regulatory enforcement by the Chinese government based on the conversion of 28,000 free-form criminal-court case texts. We focus on two main Chinese regulatory agencies, the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) and the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA). Our quantitative analysis reveals substantial differences in the regulatory functions of these two agencies. The CFDA has been far more proactive than the MOA in uncovering food-safety problems — a function we call a “lead function” — whereas the MOA has been mainly involved in providing evidence and data — a function we call a “supporting function.” To our knowledge, this article is the first to quantitatively map the Chinese government’s regulatory functions in the food industry at such a granular level. The policy implications of our findings are drawn from two contextual factors. First, a large number of China’s food-safety problems occur in the upstream sector — the sector over which the MOA exercises regulatory authority. Second, the Chinese government’s regulatory regime has mainly focused on the CFDA rather than the MOA. These findings suggest a pressing need for the MOA to undertake more lead functions.

Comparative Research on Criminal Law of Food Safety in Mainland and Macao

Public Opinions on Criminal Trials in China: A Comparative Study of Chinese College Students in the PRC and Hong Kong

Improvement and Analysis on China’s Current Food Safety Information Disclosure System

Sex Offenses Against Minors In China: An Empirical Comparison

Research on Foreign Food Safety by Criminal Laws Regulations and its Realistic Inspiration

Discussion on the Legal Liability Investigation Mechanisms for Food Safety Government Supervision

Food Safety Regulatory Enforcement in China: A Data-Driven Approach

A Comparative Study of Crime of Embezzlement between Mainland and Taiwan

Comparative Study on the Crime of Money Laundering between China and the United States

Research into Comparison Between Chinese and Western Legality Literatures

Across the Strait Comparative Study of Criminal Trademark Violations

A Probe into Several Key Problems on Connection between Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice of Food and Medicine Safety

Studies on Public Security Penalties: a Comparison Between Germany, Taiwan and Mainland China

Comparative Analysis of Administrative Regulation and Supervision in Social Insurance ;System

Comparison and Analysis of the Health Products Supervisions in China,Japan,USA and EU

Study on Criminal Jurisprudence: Western Countries' Experience and China's Reality

Criminal Law Regulation of Food Safety Crime in the Perspective of the People's Livelihood Criminal Law

On Criminal Policy for Food Safety Crime from the Perspective of the Non-traditional Security

Food safety regulatory systems in Europe and China: A study of how co-regulation can improve regulatory effectiveness

An Empirical Investigation into the Judicial Application of Article 96 of the Food Safety Law

Amendment and evaluation on criminal fine of food safety crime: Based on the comparison with criminal code of foreign countries