Abstract:Government regulations have a substantial impact on food safety, both within China and elsewhere in the world. But regulatory research is hampered by a lack of systematic data. Much of the extant regulatory research is based on interpretations of government policy and regulatory announcements. At best, qualitative analysis indicates policy and regulatory intent, not enforcement, and it lacks precision and specificity. Using natural language processing (NLP), this study creates quantitative indicators of food regulatory enforcement by the Chinese government based on the conversion of 28,000 free-form criminal-court case texts. We focus on two main Chinese regulatory agencies, the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) and the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA). Our quantitative analysis reveals substantial differences in the regulatory functions of these two agencies. The CFDA has been far more proactive than the MOA in uncovering food-safety problems — a function we call a “lead function” — whereas the MOA has been mainly involved in providing evidence and data — a function we call a “supporting function.” To our knowledge, this article is the first to quantitatively map the Chinese government’s regulatory functions in the food industry at such a granular level. The policy implications of our findings are drawn from two contextual factors. First, a large number of China’s food-safety problems occur in the upstream sector — the sector over which the MOA exercises regulatory authority. Second, the Chinese government’s regulatory regime has mainly focused on the CFDA rather than the MOA. These findings suggest a pressing need for the MOA to undertake more lead functions.

Food safety regulatory systems in Europe and China: A study of how co-regulation can improve regulatory effectiveness

Improvement and Analysis on China’s Current Food Safety Information Disclosure System

Interregional Collaboration for Food Safety Governance: the Scheme Design and Performance Evaluation with Cases in China

Food Safety Regulatory Enforcement in China: A Data-Driven Approach

Adoption of Food Safety and Quality Standards by China’s Agricultural Cooperatives: A Way out of Monitoring Production Practices of Numerous Small-scale Farmers ?

Food Safety Controls in Different Governance Structures in China's Vegetable and Fruit Industry

International Food Safety Standards: Catalysts for Increased Chinese Food Quality?

Central–local collaboration in regulating food safety in China

From Administrative Regulation to Joint Social Governance:Institutional Breakthrough in Food Safety Regulation——Based on Network Analysis

Mechanism Design of Food Safety Management and Related System Matching

Co-regulation as a possible model for food safety governance: Opportunities for public–private partnerships

A Study on Food Safety:the View of Polycentric-cooperative Governance Theory

From“Unitary One-way Piecewise Paradigm” to “Multiple Network Co-Governance Model”—The Path to Improve China's Food Safety Supervision Mechanism

Improving Vegetable Safety in China: Does Co-Regulation Work?

Food safety risk-assessment systems utilized by China, Australia/New Zealand, Canada, and the United States

Governance Logic and Basic Systems of the New “Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China”: A Focus on Social Co-Governance

Reflections and Perspectives on China's Food Safety Issues in the Context of Risk Society

Research on Government Regulation of Food Safety in China's Transitional Period

An investigation into China’s online catering food safety governance efficacy based on the strategies of frequent supervision and strict penalty

Research on Food Safety Monitoring and Management System in Developed Countries