Abstract:Government regulations have a substantial impact on food safety, both within China and elsewhere in the world. But regulatory research is hampered by a lack of systematic data. Much of the extant regulatory research is based on interpretations of government policy and regulatory announcements. At best, qualitative analysis indicates policy and regulatory intent, not enforcement, and it lacks precision and specificity. Using natural language processing (NLP), this study creates quantitative indicators of food regulatory enforcement by the Chinese government based on the conversion of 28,000 free-form criminal-court case texts. We focus on two main Chinese regulatory agencies, the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) and the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA). Our quantitative analysis reveals substantial differences in the regulatory functions of these two agencies. The CFDA has been far more proactive than the MOA in uncovering food-safety problems — a function we call a “lead function” — whereas the MOA has been mainly involved in providing evidence and data — a function we call a “supporting function.” To our knowledge, this article is the first to quantitatively map the Chinese government’s regulatory functions in the food industry at such a granular level. The policy implications of our findings are drawn from two contextual factors. First, a large number of China’s food-safety problems occur in the upstream sector — the sector over which the MOA exercises regulatory authority. Second, the Chinese government’s regulatory regime has mainly focused on the CFDA rather than the MOA. These findings suggest a pressing need for the MOA to undertake more lead functions.

Central–local collaboration in regulating food safety in China

Interregional Collaboration for Food Safety Governance: the Scheme Design and Performance Evaluation with Cases in China

Improvement and Analysis on China’s Current Food Safety Information Disclosure System

Food Safety Controls in Different Governance Structures in China's Vegetable and Fruit Industry

Food Safety Regulatory Enforcement in China: A Data-Driven Approach

Effects of Regulatory Policy Mixes on Traceability Adoption in Wholesale Markets: Food Safety Inspection and Information Disclosure

Regulatory decentralization and food safety: evidence from China

Food safety regulatory systems in Europe and China: A study of how co-regulation can improve regulatory effectiveness

Do producers respond to quality information disclosure? The HACCP certification in meat industry

International Food Safety Standards: Catalysts for Increased Chinese Food Quality?

Exploring on Traceability System of Food Safety in China

Adoption of Food Safety and Quality Standards by China’s Agricultural Cooperatives: A Way out of Monitoring Production Practices of Numerous Small-scale Farmers ?

Constructing the accountability of food safety as a public problem in China: a document analysis of Chinese scholarship, 2008–2018

From Administrative Regulation to Joint Social Governance:Institutional Breakthrough in Food Safety Regulation——Based on Network Analysis

Does Government Intervention Ensure Food Safety? Evidence from China

The limits to the internationalisation of regulation: divergent enforcement strategies in China’s food safety regulation

Food safety risk-assessment systems utilized by China, Australia/New Zealand, Canada, and the United States

Route Choices to Government Regulation Mode Transition for Food Safety in China

From“Unitary One-way Piecewise Paradigm” to “Multiple Network Co-Governance Model”—The Path to Improve China's Food Safety Supervision Mechanism

Governance Logic and Basic Systems of the New “Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China”: A Focus on Social Co-Governance

A Study on Food Safety:the View of Polycentric-cooperative Governance Theory