Abstract:In order to maximize personal interests, enterprises have a tendency to choose environmental pollution in exchange for corporate profits, resulting in negative externalities; the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China imposes legal regulations on the environmental infringement of enterprises in order to achieve the maximization of the use of the allocation of social resources and promote the sustainable development of society. Subsequent judicial interpretations have set a two-fold cap on the amount of punitive damages. However, in cases of extremely serious environmental damage, the two-fold cap on punitive damages for environmental infringement will create the possibility of insufficient compensation. Based on this, this paper analyzes the legal text of China's punitive damages provisions for environmental infringement and analyzes the interrelationships between enterprises and between enterprises and potential environmental infringement victims in a game analysis. The results of the analysis show that as the amount of punitive damages for environmental infringement increases, the probability of the infringed person filing a lawsuit and that of the enterprise reducing its environmental infringement behavior also increase. In order to promote the cause of China's sustainable development, this paper puts forward relevant suggestions for the improvement of China's environmental legal regulation: first, the upper limit of the amount of punitive damages for environmental infringement should be canceled; second, the amount of reasonable punitive damages should be set on the basis of the damages caused by environmental infringement on human beings and the environment; lastly, in the baseline setting of the amount of punitive damages, additional factors need to be taken into account, and the amount of punitive damages should be set for the enterprises with a high degree of maliciousness. Finally, additional factors need to be considered in setting the benchmark for the amount of punitive damages, which should penalize the enterprises causing environmental infringement with a high degree of malice with heavier penalties and, at the same time, penalize the enterprises with a smaller scale of operation and economic strength with lighter penalties.

The Constitutional Debate of Punitive Damages in the United States——the Excessive Fines Clause and Punitive Damages in China

From Special Mitigation to Unconstitutional Censorship: Taking Xu Ting Case as an Example

The development, shortcomings and future improvement of punitive damages for environmental torts in China—a reflection and comparative research

The Pretrial Agreement System of American Corporate Crime in the Perspective of Constitutionalism:Reviewing the Stein Case

The Construction of the Measure of Damages on Insider Trading

Research on the Constitution of Regulatory Taking

Punitive damages under the new Chinese Civil Code – a critical and comparative analysis

Punitive Damage in the World's Major Countries

Research on the Judicial Application of The Punitive Damages System for Environmental Infringement

Criticism on the Theory Obstacle of Punitive Damages in Our Country

Study on the application of the system of punitive damages for ecological environmental infringement in Civil Code

Punitive damages under Chinese patent law

Corporate environmental infringement, legal regulation, and sustainable development: punitive damages as a perspective

Response on Principles of the Constitutional Human Rights about Penalty Structure Adjustment

"Just Compensation" and the Constitutional Restriction on Expropriation

Some Issues on the "Objective Punishment Condition"

Judicial Application of Punitive Damages for Ecological Environment Infringement in Civil Public Interest Litigation

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

An empirical examination of liability for ecological environment restoration in the context of the Civil Code of China

The Debate Over the Death Penalty in Today’s China

Analyzing the necessity of applying punitive damages in non-personal-injury pharmaceutical cases