The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus: British Museum 10057 and 10058 Photographic Facsimile, Hieroglyphic Transcription, Transliteration, Literal Translation, Free Translation, Mathematical Commentary, and Bibliography
T. L. H.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/125962a0
IF: 64.8
1930-06-01
Nature
Abstract:WHEN Prof. T. Eric Peet's handsome and in every respect admirable edition of the Rhind Papyrus appeared in 1923, anyone who read it must have felt that we had afr long last (nearly fifty years had passed since the publication of Eisenlohr's edition) a definitive translation and commentary, with all such detailed discussion of points arising on the text and its interpretation as would give Egyptologists and mathematicians, once for all, a sound basis for further researches on the subject. The immediate effect of Prof. Peet's publication was to usher in an epoch of fresh intensive study of the principles of Egyptian mathematics, which bids fair to put into the shade the work of those pioneers, like Moritz Cantor and Hultsch, who first took the matter up after Eisen-lohr. First Mr. Battiscombe Gunn published in the Journal of Egyptian Archæology for 1926 an invaluable critical notice of Peet's work covering fifteen pages of small print, in which he put forward many suggestions for improvements in the translation of the text and the mathematical interpretation; so important were these that, wherever Peet's work is quoted by later writers, we almost invariably find Mr. Gunn also cited; the two are associated in a joint article in the Journal of Egyptian Archæology of November 1929 on four problems from the Moscow Papyrus, the publication of which in full is expected at an early date. But there has been equal activity abroad. Important papers have appeared in the last few years, notably those of 0. Neugebauer (1926), 0. Gillain (1927), and, last of all, Kurt Vogel in “Die Grund-lagen der ägyptischen Arithmetik” (1929), a book of 208 pages, which deals mainly with the table at the beginning of the Rhind, showing the decomposition, into a sum of submultiples, that is, fractions with numerator unity, of the results of dividing 2 by each of the odd numbers 3, 5, 7 … up to 101, and which seems to be the most comprehensive work of all, since, in addition to the author's own elaboration of his subject, it contains notices of all earlier important contributions to the same.
multidisciplinary sciences