Abstract:Through a broad structural analysis and a close reading of Old Babylonian mathematica] "procedure texts" dealing mainly with problems of the second degree it is shown that Old Babylonian "algebra" was neither a "rhetorical algebra" dealing with numbers and arithmetical relations between numbers nor built on a set of fixed algorithmic procedures. Instead, the texts must be read as "naive" prescriptions for geometric analysis—naive in the sense that the results are seen by immediate intuition to be correct, but the question of correctness never raised—dealing with measured or measurable but unknown line segments, and making use of a set of operations and techniques different in structure from that of arithmetical algebra. The investigation involves a thorough discussion and re-interpretation of the technical terminology of Old Babylonian mathematics, elucidates many terms and procedures which have up to now been enigmatic, and makes many features stand out which had not been noticed before. The second-last chapter discusses the metamathematical problem, whether and to which extent we are then entitled to speak of an Old Babylonian algebra ; it also takes up the over-all implications of the investigation for the understanding of Old Babylonian patterns of thought. It is argued that these are not mythopoeic in the sense of H. and H. A. Frankfort, nor savage or cold in a Lévi-Straussian sense, nor however as abstract and modern as current interpretations of the mathematical texts would have them to be. The last chapter investigates briefly the further development of Babylonian "algebra" through the Seleucid era, demonstrating a clear arithmetization of the patterns of mathematical thought, the possible role of Babylonian geometrical analysis as inspiration for early Greek geometry, and the legacy of Babylonian "algebraic" thought to Medieval Islamic algebra.

Algebra and Naive Geometry. an Investigation of Some Basic Aspects of Old Babylonian Mathematical Thought I

On a Collection of Geometrical Riddles and Their Role in the Shaping of Four to Six “Algebras”

Mesopotamian Mathematics, Seen “from the Inside” (by Assyriologists) and “from the Outside” (by Historians of Mathematics)

Mathematical Susa Texts VII and VIII. A Reinterpretation

Algebra in the Scribal School—schools in Old Babylonia Algebra?

Further “Algebraic” Texts

The Algorithm Concept --- Tool for Historiographic Interpretation or Red Herring?

THE RARE TRACES OF CONSTRUCTIONAL PROCEDURES IN "PRACTICAL GEOMETRIES"

What did the abbacus teachers really do when they (sometimes) ended up doing mathematics?

EXPLICIT AND LESS EXPLICIT ALGORITHMIC THINKING, 1200-1500. JORDANUS DE NEMORE, AND THE CONTRAST BETWEEN BARTHELEMY DE ROMANS ET CHUQUET

The Roles of Mesopotamian Bronze Age Mathematics Tool for State Formation and Administration – Carrier of Teachers’ Professional Intellectual Autonomy

When is the Algorithm Concept Pertinent – and when Not? Thoughts about Algorithms and Paradigmatic Examples, and about Algorithmic and Non-Algorithmic Mathematical Cultures1

Remarkable Numbers in Old Babylonian Mathematical Texts - A Note on the Psychology of Numbers

Dýnamis, the Babylonians, and Theaetetus 147C7–148d7

A Note on Old Babylonian Computational Techniques

What is “geometric Algebra”, and What Has It Been in Historiography?<sup>1</sup>

From the Practice of Explanation to the Ideology of Demonstration: an Informal Essay

From Concrete to Abstract in Indian Mathematics

What is “geometric algebra”, and what has it been in historiography?<sup>1</sup>

Which Kind of Mathematics Was Known and Referred to by Those Who Wanted to Integrate Mathematics in «wisdom» –neopythagoreans and Others?

A Survey of the Development of Geometry up to 1870