Abstract:The “unknown heritage” is the name usually given to a problem type in whose archetype a father leaves to his first son 1 monetary unit and \({\frac{1}{n}}\) (n usually being 7 or 10) of what remains, to the second 2 units and \({\frac{1}{n}}\) of what remains, and so on. In the end, all sons get the same, and nothing remains. The earliest known occurrence is in Fibonacci’s Liber abbaci, which also contains a number of much more sophisticated versions, together with a partial algebraic solution for one of these and rules for all which do not follow from his algebraic calculation. The next time the problem turns up is in Planudes’s late thirteenth century Calculus according to the Indians, Called the Great. After that the simple problem type turns up regularly in Provençal, Italian and Byzantine sources. It seems never to appear in Arabic or Indian writings, although two Arabic texts (one from c. 1190) contain more regular problems where the number of shares is given; they are clearly derived from the type known from European and Byzantine works, not its source. The sophisticated versions turn up again in Barthélemy de Romans’ Compendy de la praticque des nombres (c. 1467) and, apparently inspired from there, in the appendix to Nicolas Chuquet’s Triparty (1484). Apart from a single trace in Cardano’s Practica arithmetice et mensurandi singularis, the sophisticated versions never surface again, but the simple version spreads for a while to German practical arithmetic and, more persistently, to French polite recreational mathematics. Close examination of the texts shows that Barthélemy cannot have drawn his familiarity with the sophisticated rules from Fibonacci. It also suggests that the simple version is originally either a classical, strictly Greek or Hellenistic, or a medieval Byzantine invention; and that the sophisticated versions must have been developed before Fibonacci within an environment (located in Byzantium, Provence, or possibly in Sicily?) of which all direct traces has been lost, but whose mathematical level must have been quite advanced.

Remarkable Numbers in Old Babylonian Mathematical Texts - A Note on the Psychology of Numbers

On Subtractive Operations, Subtractive Numbers, and Purportedly Negative Numbers in Old Babylonian Mathematics

The Powers of 9 and Related Mathematical Tables from Babylon

Mesopotamian Mathematics, Seen “from the Inside” (by Assyriologists) and “from the Outside” (by Historians of Mathematics)

Essays on Early Medieval Mathematics: the Latin Tradition - by Menso Folkerts

Algebra and Naive Geometry. an Investigation of Some Basic Aspects of Old Babylonian Mathematical Thought I

A Note on Old Babylonian Computational Techniques

Mathematical Susa Texts VII and VIII. A Reinterpretation

On a Collection of Geometrical Riddles and Their Role in the Shaping of Four to Six “Algebras”

Geometrie der Zahlen. Ein Überblick

Computational Techniques and Computational Aids in Ancient Mesopotamia

The "unknown Heritage": Trace of A Forgotten Locus of Mathematical Sophistication

What did the abbacus teachers really do when they (sometimes) ended up doing mathematics?

On Parts of Parts and Ascending Continued Fractions an Investigation of the Origins and Spread of a Peculiar System

Intuitive, didactically useful, and historically possible proofs for the two Egyptian pyramid volume formulas (1850 BCE). Thoughts on the border between history and didactics of mathematics

Mathematics Hidden Behind the Two Coefficients of Babylonian Mathematics

Proof of the Irrationality of the Square Root of Two in Babylonian Geometry Problem Tablets

Floating calculation in Mesopotamia

How to Construct a Large Table of Babylonian Mathematics

Using Figurate Numbers in Elementary Number Theory - Discussing a 'Useful' Heuristic From the Perspectives of Semiotics and Cognitive Psychology

Dýnamis, the Babylonians, and Theaetetus 147C7–148d7