Comparison Of Test Results And Performances Of Hitachi 7600 And Beckman Olympus 5800 Automatic Biochemical Analyzers

Lang Lang,Xu Li,Xin Luo,Juan Du,Yan Huang,Dengxiu Cao,Meng Li
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective: The test quality and stability of the biochemical analyzer test systems are extremely important because they can affect the medical standards of an entire hospital. Therefore, the performance test and evaluation of biochemical analyzers are important for their daily use. To investigate the performances of Hitachi 7600 and Beckman AU5800 automatic biochemical analyzers, and evaluate the consistency of the test results. Materials and Methods: Collect 400 clinical serum samples, and test 50 indices using the Hitachi 7600 and Beckman AU5800 automatic biochemical analyzers. Calculate the precision, accuracy, and other performance indices, and then compare the differences in the performances of the two instruments. Results: From the test speed of the 400 blood samples, the test times of Beckman AU5800 and Hitachi are (3.6 +/- 0.4) h and (4.7 +/- 0.8) h, respectively, and the test speed of AU5800 is significantly higher than that of Hitachi 7600 (P < 0.05). The difference in the test results of the quality control product is not statistically significant (P > 0.05). For comparing the bias of the test results, the qualification rates of all the test items are > 90% with bias < <1/2> EQA (External Quality Assessment) as the criterion. There is a reasonable consistency between the test results of the two instruments. In terms of the sample injection speed, test, and reporting speed, AU5800 operates faster than Hitachi 7600. Conclusions: Both the automatic biochemical analyzers have a good precision and accuracy, with AU5800 having a faster test speed. Therefore, AU5800 is recommended to be used in hospitals and test centers with a large sample size, which can suitably share the pressure of emergency samples.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?