Abstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the shaping ability of ProGlider, HyFlex EDM Glidepath File and RaCe ISO 10 with that of PathFile and stainless steel K-file hand instruments in simulated root canals. METHODS A total of 60 simulated resin blocks were divided randomly into five groups (n=12), each group prepared with each instrument, respectively. Preparation time was recorded. Pre- and post-operative images were obtained using a scanner and superimposed using Photoshop. The material removal from the inner and outer canal walls beginning from 0 mm at the end point of the canal were measured using ImageJ. Centering ability was determined, accordingly. The data were analyzed using the One-Way ANOVA at a significance level of P<0.05. RESULTS Preparation time for ProGlider was (61.018±5.020) s, significantly the fastest (P < 0.05), that for SS K-file (111.100±6.987) s, the slowest (P<0.05), and the differences among the other 3 groups were not significant (P>0.05). The removal of resin from the outer wall at the apical portion was significantly lower for HyFlex EDM Glidepath File than for ProGlider (P<0.05), both of them were significantly lower than the other 3 groups (P<0.05). For the removal from the inner wall at the curvature portion, ProGlider was the least whilst SS K-file the most (P<0.05). At the straight portion, RaCe ISO 10 removed the most not only from the inner but also the outer wall (P<0.05), HyFlex EDM Glidepath File the second most, and the other 3 groups among the same levels. As far as the centering ability was concerned, at the apical portion, HyFlex EDM Glidepath File was the best, ProGlider the second best, no significant difference identified among the other 3 groups. At the curvature portion, ProGlider and HyFlex EDM Glidepath File were the best, PathFile the second, RaCe ISO 10 the third, the worst was the SS K-file. At the straight portion, the difference amongt the 5 groups was not significant. CONCLUSION The shaping abilities of ProGlider, HyFlex EDM Glidepath File and RaCe ISO 10 were better or comparable to that of PathFile, while the preparation time for ProGlider reduced significantly, and HyFlex EDM Glidepath File and RaCe ISO 10 removed significantly more resin at the straight portion of the canal.

Comparison of the Shaping Ability of Different Nickel⁃titanium Instruments in Simulated Root Canals in Resin

[Comparison of the ability of four different kinds of nickel-titanium instruments to prepare simulated resin to simulate curved root canal forming]

Shaping ability of R-phase nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals

[Comparison of the Shaping Capability of Reciprocating Instruments in Simulated Canals in Vitro].

Comparative Assessment of the Shaping Ability of Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and ProTaper Gold in Simulated Root Canals

Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Three Thermally Treated Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments on Standardized 3D-printed Dental Replicas Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF APICAL EXTRUSION OF DEBRIS AND SHAPING ABILITY IN CURVED ROOT CANALS USING FOUR DIFFERENT NITI INSTRUMENTS

Assessment of Shaping Ability of ProTaper in Curved Canals

Gentlefile Versus Protaper in the Shaping Ability in Simulated J-shaped Root Canals

Shaping ability of novel nickel-titanium systems in printed primary molars

Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study

Assessment of Shaping Ability of Nickel-Titanium Hand Instruments(iso) in Curved Canals

A clinical comparation of the shaping abilities of the two types of rotary nickel-titanium instruments in molar canals

Root Canal Shaping Effect of Instruments with Offset Mass of Rotation in the Mandibular First Molar: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study

Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography

[Glide Path Management of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Simulated Root Canals].

Comparative Study of Torsional and Bending Properties for Six Models of Nickel-Titanium Root Canal Instruments with Different Cross-Sections.

Evaluation of root canal preparation using two nickel–titanium instrument systems via cone-beam computed tomography

Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study

Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals

Root canal preparation efficiency of protaper vs. combined technique in simulated resin root canal