[Comparison of the ability of four different kinds of nickel-titanium instruments to prepare simulated resin to simulate curved root canal forming]
Zhao-Huang Liang,Yao Zhang
Abstract:Purpose: To compare the forming ability of four kinds of nickel-titanium instrument preparation resin for simulated curved root canal. Methods: A total of 40 single bend resin simulated root canals were randomly divided into 4 groups with 10 in each group. Four kinds of nickel-titanium instruments (ProTaper, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold and Reciproc Blue) were used for root canal preparation, and divided into group A, group B, group C and group D. The preparation time of the four groups was compared, the root canal images before and after preparation were analyzed by computer image analysis software, and the changes of the preparation time, curvature and curvature radius of the four groups were recorded. With the root tip as the center of the circle, the radius of 1-10 mm was selected as concentric circle arcs. The detection points were overlapping root canal intersection points. The resin removal amount and center positioning force of the inner and outer walls of the root canal at different detection points were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 20.0 software package. Results: The root canal preparation time in group A was significant longer than that in group B, C and D(P＜0.05), but there was no significant difference in the curvature and curvature radius of the root canal among the four groups (P＞0.05). The removal amount of resin from the root canal wall in group C was significant lower than that in group A, B and D (P＜0.05) when the distance from the detection point to the apical foramina was 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 mm, respectively. The removal amount of resin from the outer wall of the root canal in group C was significant lower than that in group A, B and D (P＜0.05) when the distance from the detection point to the apical foramina was 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 mm, respectively. The root tip offset of group A from the detection point to the apical hole of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 mm was significant greater than that of group B, C and D(P＜0.05). Conclusions: Among the four instruments, ProTaper has the largest apical deviation, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold and Reciproc Blue have better ability of root canal forming.