Comparison of catalytic combustion of methane andn-butane in microtube

Yefeng WANG,Junhu ZHOU,Qingchen ZHAO,Weijuan YANG,Jingsong ZHOU,Yanwei ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161322
2017-01-01
Abstract:Catalytic combustion of methane and n-butane with Pt/ZSM-5 in a microtube was studied on self-sustaining combustion limits, product concentrations, wall temperature, and surface heat loss. The catalytic combustion of methane andn-butane could be sustained at very high molar ratio (Φ) in rich burn condition. At the same flow rate,n-butane had broader self-sustaining combustion limit than methane with lean burn limit around 0.4. Conversion of the two fuels decreased steeply with flow rate increased from 200 to 1000 ml·min?1, which were largely due to decrease of residence time and increase of weight hourly space velocity (WHSV). The combustion conversion of methane andn-butane showed minimal difference within the range of experiments. As a result of activation of gas-phase reactions posterior to catalyst and its feedback effect to catalytic reaction, n-butane had higher conversion than methane at the same chemical normality upon flow rate reaching to 600 ml·min?1. Both methane andn-butane could have self-sustaining combustion with above 95% conversion even when ratio of through-wall heat loss to input power was reached to 70%. Compared to that of methane,n-butane combustion produced higher wall temperature, through-wall heat loss rate, and ratio of through-wall heat loss rate to input power, which was directly related to the activation of gas-phase reactions inn-butane combustion. Overall, considered broader combustion limit, similar conversion curve, minimal difference in heat generate rate and through-wall heat loss,n-butane could be an alternative fuel to methane when necessary.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?