Influent factors in thorax image quality on sensation 64-slice spiral CT:a phantom study

赵晶,康德强,郭英,沈云
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2009.12.004
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To characterize the influent factors on thorax image quality in high resolution CT(HRCT),and explore the feasibility of obtained HRCT images with cone-beam scan instead of fan-beam scan.Methods Catphan500 phantom were consecutively underwent 64-MSCT scan using different scan mode and reconstruction kernel:scan mode (axial and helical scan mode) ;current (140 and 120 kV) ;slice thickness (1.25 mm slice scanned and 5.00 mm slice scanned reconstructed by 1.25 mm) ;algorithms (lung and bone plus). High-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast spatial resolution from Catphan500 phantom and image noise for each CT scan were all recorded and results were analyzed by variance ANOVA analysis.Results Low-contrast spatial resolution (fan-beam scan:11.44±0.04,cone-beam scan:12.61±0.04) and image noise (fan-beam scan:5.89±0.05,cone-beam scan:6.92±0.05) were significantly different between two scan modes (F=539.61,179.02 respectively,all P value<0.01).Result of axial mode was better than that of helical mode. High-contrast spatial resolution (bone plus:9.90±0.09,lung:7.40±0.09) low-contrast spatial resolution (bone plus:11.39±0.04,lung:12.65±0.04) and image noise (bone plus:6.55±0.05 ;lung:6.28±0.05) were significantly differet between lung and bone plus algorithms (F=375.00,627.95,13.97 respectively,all P value< 0.05).Bone plus reconstruction images were sharper,but had more noise than lung reconstruction images. Conclusions High-contrast spatial resolution of image using volume scan and bone plus algorithms was comparable with conventional HRCT. Volume HRCT can provide the same diagnostic value for pulmonary disease as conventional HRCT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?